Laserfiche WebLink
ABOUT FORTY-FIVE PEOPLE ADDRESSED THE COUNCIL IN OPPOSITION, AND URGED THAT THE <br /> <br />1967 PLAN BE ABANDONED AND THE AMENDED PLAN BE ADOPTED. h/~. JOHN So WISE ADDRESSED THE COUNCIL <br />IN SUPPORT OF THE 1987 PLAN. <br /> <br /> AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE HEARING, THE MAYOR STATED THAT ACTION WOULD BE TAKEN AT THE NEXT <br /> <br />REGULAR COUNCIL HEETING. <br /> <br /> ON MOTION THE MEETING ADJOURNED. <br /> <br />COUNC I L CHAMBER - NOVEMBER 1, 1971 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION RE <br /> EDWARDS <br /> <br />MATTER RE: MAJOR <br />THOROUGHFARE PLAN <br /> <br />RESOLUT ION RE: <br />MAJOR ARTERIAL STREET <br />AND HIGHWAY PLAN <br /> <br /> THE COUNCIL MET IN REGULAR SESSION ON THIS DATE WITH THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS PRESENT: <br /> <br />MR. BARBOUR, MR. DAVIS, HR. FIFE, MR. VAN YAHRES AND MR. WRIGHT. ABSENT: NONE. <br /> <br /> REV. TIM JOHNSON, YOUTH MINISTER OF THE CHERRY AVENUE CHRISTIAN CHURCH, GAVE THE <br />INVOCATION. <br /> <br /> THE MINUTES OF THE MEETINGS OF OCTOBER 18, 1971 AND OCTOBER 19, 1971 WERE APPROVED AS <br />PRESENTED. <br /> <br /> ON MOTION BY MR. DAVIS~ SECONDED BY MR. WRIGHT, THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY <br />ADOPTED: <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, TAZEWELL WAYNE EDWARDS ASSUMED DUTY AS CITY ENGINEER IN 1945; AND <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, FOR TWENTY-SIX YEARS HE FILLED THIS IMPORTANT POST WITH HIGH <br /> <br />PROFESSIONAL SKILL; AND <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, HiS WARM AND SYMPATHETIC PERSONALITY GAVE JOY AND INSPIRATION <br /> <br />TO ALL WHO WERE FORTUNATE TO KNOW HIM; AND <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, HIS UNTIMELY DEATH ON THURSDAY, OCTOBER 28~ 1971, is A LOSS <br /> <br />DEEPLY FELT BY HIS MANY FRIENDS IN CITY GOVERNMENT AND IN THE COMMUNITY AT LARGE, <br /> <br /> NO~, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE COUNC I L HEREBY E~$~E'S' ~N ' I-~S <br /> <br />OWN BEHALF AND FOR ALL OF THE COMMUNITY THE DEEP AND ABIDING SORROW OF OUR LOSS; AND <br /> <br /> BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE COUNCIL EXTENDS its SINCERE SYMPATHY TO HIS <br /> <br />BEREAVED WIFE AND SON AND TO HIS FAMILY; AND <br /> <br /> BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO SPREAD THE TEXT OF THIS <br />RESOLUTION IN THE MINUTES OF THIS HEETING. <br /> <br /> THE MAYOR ANNOUNCED THAT CONSIDERATION WOULD BE GIVEN TO A DECISION ON THE MAJOR THOROUGH- <br />FARE PLAN. THE CITY MANAGER ADVISED THE COUNCIL THAT OFFICIALS OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF <br />HIGHWAYS HAD ADVISED HIM THAT THE COUNCIL COULD OMIT THOSE STREET PLANS TO WHICH THE PUBLIC <br />OBJECTED. ON MOTION BY MR. FIFE, SECONDED BY MR. WRIGHT, THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS UN- <br />ANIMOUSLY ADOPTED: <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, ON APRIL 22, 1968, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE <br /> <br />APPROVED THE MAJOR ARTERIAL STREET AND HIGHWAY PLAN FOR CHARLOTTESVILLE, DEVELOPED <br />BY THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, AND TRANSMITTED ITS APPROVAL TO SAID HIGHWAY <br />DEPARTMENT, AND <br /> <br /> WHEREAS~ CHANGING CONDITIONS AND CIRCUMSTANCES NOW INDICATE THAT CERTAIN OF <br /> <br />THE PROJECTS CONTAINED IN THE ABOVE MENTIONED PLAN AS ORIGINALLY CONTEMPLATED MAY <br /> <br />NQT BE IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE ClTY~ AND <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, IT IS DESIRED THAT ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS BE FULLY EXPLORED <br /> <br />BEFORE FURTHER'CONSIDERATION IS GIVEN TO CERTAIN PROJECTS CONTAINED IN THE PLAN, <br /> <br />AND <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, IN SPITE OF IMPRESSIONS TO THE CONTRARY~ THE 9TH STREET-lOTH <br /> <br />STREET PROJECT AND THE GRADY-GORDON CORRIDOR PROJECT ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE PLAN <br /> <br />AS ORIGINALLY APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, AND THAT FACT IS HEREIN REAFF{RMED. <br /> <br /> <br />