Laserfiche WebLink
268 <br /> <br />MATTER RE: UTILITY <br />CONTRACT - ALBEMARLE <br />DEVELOP. CORP. <br /> <br /> TAKE NOTICE <br /> <br /> A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE COUNCIL WILL BE HELD THIS AFTERNOON THE 19TH INST. <br />AT 5:00 P. M. O~CLOCK- <br /> <br />1. CONSIDERATION OF UTILITY CONTRACT WITH ALBEMARLE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. <br /> <br /> BY ORDER OF <br /> <br />J. S. RUSH~ JR. (SIGNED) CLERK <br /> <br />FRANCIS H. FIFE {SIGNED) <br /> PRES I DENT <br /> <br /> THE COUNCIL HET iN SPECIAL SESSION ON THIS DATE WITH THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS PRESENT: <br /> <br />HR. FIFE~ MR, GILLIAM~ MRS. RINEHART AND ~o VAN YAHRES. ABSENT: MR. BARBOUR. <br /> A UTILITY CONTRACT BETWEEN BISHOP JOHN O. RUSSELL~ OWNER OF BRANCHLAND~ THE CITY AND <br />ALBEMARLE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION IN WHICH BISHOP RUSSELL CONVEYS TO ALBEMARLE DEVELOPMENT <br />CORPORATION A 25 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT THROUGH HIS PROPERTY. IN CONSIDERATION OF THIS <br />EASEMENT THE CITY AGREES TO FURNISH 100 RESIDENTIAL SEWER CONNECTIONS FOR THE USE OF BRANCH- <br />LAND~ AND AT SUCH TIME AS SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT CAPACITY IS AVAILABLE~ AN ADDITIONAL 800 <br />CONNECTIONS. ALL CONNECTIONS TO BE MADE AT ACTUAL COST TO PROPERTY OWNER. THE CITY ALSO <br />AGREES TO PROVIDE WATER TO BRANCHLAND UPON INSTALLATION OF A WATER TRANSMISSION LINE. ON <br />MOTION BY MR. VAN YAHRES~ SECONDED BY MRS. RINEHART~ THE FOREGOING CONTRACT WAS UNANIMOUSLY <br /> <br />APPROVED, <br /> <br /> ON MOTION THE MEETING ADJOURNED. <br /> <br />PRES I DENT <br /> <br />COUNCIL CHAMBER - OCTOBER 9, 1972 <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING RE: <br />KNOLL TERRACE <br /> <br />ORDINANCE ADOPTED RE: <br />VACATING PORTION <br />KNOLL TERRACE <br /> <br />MATTER RE: ELM ST. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION RE: <br />CONFLICT OF INTERESTS <br />ACT <br /> <br /> THE COUNCIL MET IN REGULAR SESSION ON THIS DATE WITH THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS PRESENT: <br /> <br />MR. BARBOUR~ MR. FIFE~ MR. GILLIAM~ MRS. RINEHART AND MR. VAN YAHRES. ABSENT: NONE. <br /> REV. STANLEY HIERS~ PASTOR OF CHRISTIAN MISSIONARY ALLIANCE CHURCH~ GAVE THE INVOCATION. <br /> THE HINUTES OF THE MEETINGS OF SEPTEMBER 18~ 1972 AND SEPTEMBER 19~ 1972 WERE APPROVED <br /> <br />AS CORRECTED. <br /> <br /> A PUBLIC HEARING WAS HELD ON THIS DATE ON A PROPOSED ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF <br />THE PLAT OF KNOLL TERRACE PURSUANT TO SECTION 15.1-482(B)~ CODE OF VIRGINIA. NO ONE APPEARED <br />FOR OR AGAINST THE PROPOSAL. <br /> AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED 'JAN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF THE PLAT OF KNOLL TERRACE AND <br />VACATING CERTAIN STREETS THEREIN", WHICH WAS OFFERED AT THE MEETING OF THE COUNCIL ON <br />SEPTEMBER 18, 1972, WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING RECORDED VOTE: AYES: MR. BARBOUR~ MR. GILLIAM, <br />MRS. RINEHART AND MR. VAN YAHRES. NOES: NONE. (MR. FIFE NOT VOTING) <br /> MR. OTIS LEE ADDRESSED THE COUNCIL AND COMPLAINED ABOUT THE CONDITION Of ELM STREET. THE <br /> CITY MANAGER ADVISED THE COUNCIL THAT A SURVEY IS CURRENTLY BEING MADE TO DETERMINE THE COST <br /> OF BRINGING ALL UNACCEPTED STREETS UP TO CiTY STANDARDS. <br /> ON MOTION BY MR. GILLIAM~ SECONDED BY MR. BARBOUR~. THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS UNANIMOUS- <br /> <br />LY ADOPTED: <br /> WHEREAS, THE VIRGINIA CONFLICT OF INTERESTS ACT ESTABLISHES MINIMUM STANDARDS <br />OF CONDUCT FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS; AND <br /> WHEREAS~ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DESIRES TO ESTABLISH~ <br />BY RESOLUTION~ HIGHER STANDARDS OF CONDUCT FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS IN THE CITY OF CHARLOTTES- <br />VILLE IN ORDER TO AMELIORATE LEGITIMATE CITIZEN CONCERN FOR THE CONDUCT OF PUBLIC BUSINESS; <br /> NOW~ THEREFORE~ BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE THAT: <br /> MEMBERS OF BOARDS APPOINTED BY THIS COUNCIL~ IN ADDITION TO DISCLOSING THE FACT <br />THAT THEY MAY HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTERESTS WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN MATTERS BEFORE THEM~ <br />SHALL REFRAIN FROM APPEARING AS AN ADVOCATE BEFORE THE BOARD OR AGENCY TO WHICH THEY HAVE <br />BEEN APPOINTED IN ANY CASE IN WHICH SUCH MEMBER HAS~ OR REPRESENTS A PERSON WHO HAS~ A <br />PROPRIETARY INTEREST~ EXCEPT THAT: <br /> (1) NOTHING CONTAINED IN THIS RESOLUTION SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO PROHIBIT <br /> SUCH MEMEER FROM ANSWERING QUESTIONS OF A FACTUAL NATURE WHEN SUCH MEMBER HAS <br /> <br /> <br />