Laserfiche WebLink
MATTER RE: DAYLIGHT <br />SAVING TIME <br /> <br />STATEMENT RE: <br />DAYLIGHT SAVING TIME <br />CUT OFF DATE <br /> <br /> THE COUNCIL MET IN SPECIAL SESSION ON THIS DATE WITH THE FOLLOWING <br /> <br /> MEMBERS PRESENT: MR. HAGGERTY, HR. LEE, HR. MOUNT AND MR.' PONTON. ABSENT: <br /> <br /> MR. SCRIBNER. <br /> <br /> THE VICE-HAYOR ANNOUNCED THAT THE PURPOSE OF THIS MEETING WAS TO CONSIDER <br /> <br /> A CUT OFF DATE FOR DAYLIGHT SAVING TIME. SEVERAL PEOPLE, REPRESENTING THE,RETAIL <br /> HERCHANTS~ THE SCHOOLS AND INDUSTRIES OF THE AREA~ ADDRESSED THE COUNCIL AND URGED <br /> THE COUNCIL TO CONSIDER A UNIFORM DATE WITH ALBEMARLE COUNTY. <br /> <br /> HR. MOUNT MADE THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT: <br /> <br /> CITY COUNCIL, AT THE REQUEST OF MANY INDIVIDUAL CITiZENS~ BUSINESSES, INDUSTRIES <br /> AND CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS) ADOPTED DAYLIGHT SAVING TIME TO COINCIDE WITH PRACTICES <br /> FOLLOWED THROUGHOUT THE NATION WHERE FAST TIME IS OBSERVED. THIS MEANT THAT <br /> CHARLOTTESVILLE WOULD REVERT TO [ASTERN STANDARD TIME ON OCTOBER 29. <br /> <br /> COUNCILTS ACT1ON WASBY NO MEANS BINDING ON THE CITIZENS AND BUSINESSES OF <br /> <br /> THE COMMUNITY SINCE THE CITY, BY STATE LAW, CANNOT ENFORCE FAST TIME. HOWEVER, <br /> THE ACTION WAS MET WITH OVERWHELMING ACCEPTANCE BY THE PEOPLE OF THIS COMMUNITY. <br /> <br /> 'DESPITE THE FACT THAT THE CITYTS PLANS FOR AN OCTOBER 29 CUTBACK HAVE BEEN <br /> KNOWN FOR MONTHS, THE ALBEMARLE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, WITHOUT ~ONSULTATION WITH <br /> CITY OFFICIALS) ARBITRARILY DECIDED TO END FAST TIME ON SEPTEMBER 1. <br /> <br /> ALL MAJOR INDUSTRIES IN THE CITY AND COUNTY, THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND <br /> <br /> THE RETAIL HERCHANTS ASSOCIATION HAVE EXPRESSED THEMSELVES AS FAVORtNG: FIRST~ <br /> AN OCTOBER 29 CUTBACK; SECOND~ A SEPTEMBER 30 CUTBACK; AND LASTLY~ A SEPTEMBER 1 <br /> SWlTCHOVER. <br /> <br /> IT IS DISAPPOINTING TO THE CITY COUNCIL~ AS IT MUST BE TO THE THOUSANDS OF <br /> CITIZENS IN THE COMMUNITY~ THAT THE ALBEMARLE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IS UNWILLING <br /> TO ACCEPT EITHER ONE OF THE FIRST TWO CHOICES OF THESE BUSINESSES AND THE MANY <br /> FINE PEOPLE THEY EMPLOY. <br /> <br /> THE CITY COUNCIL IS MOST ANXIOUS AND WILLING TO GRANT TO THESE CITIZENS THEIR <br />FIRST REQUEST. <br /> <br /> HOWEVER, AN IMPOSSIBLE SITUATION WOULD RESULT IF THE CITY AND COUNTY OPERATED <br />ON DIFFERENT TIME. CHAOS AND CONFUSION WOULD BE THE RESULT. IT IS THEREFORE WITH <br />DEEP REGRET THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MUST ASK THE PEOPLE OF THIS CITY TO RESUME <br />EASTERN STANDARD TIME AT 2:00 A. M. ON SEPTEMBER 3, 1961. IT SHOULD BE ADDED <br />THAT THE COUNCIL WILL BE HAPPY TO CONSIDER A SEPTEMBER 30 CUTBACK IF MEMBERS OF <br />THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AT SOME LATER DELIBERATION SHOULD DESIRE TO ALTER THEIR <br />POSITION ACCORDINGLY. <br /> <br /> ON MOTION BY MR. H0~N~, SECONDED BY MR'. 'LEE,' THE MAYOR WAS REQUESTED TO <br /> <br />ISSUE A PROCLAMATION SETTINg' SEPTEMBER 3; 'igGt AT 2::00 ~o H. AS THE DATE'FoR <br /> <br />RESUMPTION OF STANDARD:TiME. <br /> <br />ON MOTION THE MEETING ADJOURNED. <br /> <br />COUNCIL CHAMBER - AUGUST 28, 1 961 <br /> <br />PURSUANT TO THE FOLLOWING CALL: <br /> <br />MR. BERNARD d. HAGGERTY <br />MR. R. E. LEE <br />MR. LINDSAY B. MOUNT <br />MR. J. R. PONTON <br />HR. L. L. SCRIBNER <br /> <br /> <br />