Laserfiche WebLink
PROGRESS REPORT PRESENTED- <br />JEFF. CABLE CORP. <br /> <br />CiTY MGR. TO EXECUTE <br />CONTRACT WITH C & O. <br /> <br />ORDINANCE CARRIED OVER <br />RE: SEC. 11-15 - CH. 11 <br /> <br />ORDINANCE ADOPTED RE: <br />HEARING OF APPEAL <br /> <br />APPROPRIATION - SCHOOL <br />PURPOSES <br /> <br />REPORT OF SCHOOL BOARD <br />PRESENTED BY DR. R~SHTON <br /> <br />SCHOOL BOARD REPORT <br /> <br />MR. ROBERT MONROE, PRESIDENT OF THE JEFFERSON CABLE CORPORATION,WAS PRESENT AND <br /> <br />ADVISED THE COUNCIL THAT EVERY EFFORT IS BEING MADE TO IMPROVE THE RECEPTION FROM <br /> <br />WASHINGTON. <br /> <br /> A PROGRESS REPORT WAS PRESENTED FROM JEFFERSON CABLE CORPORATION OUTLINING THE <br /> <br />AREAS WHICH HAVE RECENTLY BEEN COMPLETED AND A SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION OF THE REMAINING <br />AREAS. <br /> A COMMUNICATION WAS PRESENTED FROM RADIO STATION WCHV EXPLAINING THE REASON FOR <br />THE MEETING OF JANUARY 16, 1967 NOT BEING ON THE AIR. <br /> ON MOTI,ON BY MR. VOGT~ SECONDED BY MR. JOHNSON, THE CITY MANAGER WAS AUTHORIZED <br />TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH THE CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY, DATED DECEMBER <br /> <br />13, 1966, FOR A SIX INCH (6") GAS LINE AND AN EIGHT INCH (8") WATER LINE CROSSING <br /> <br />AT CARLTON ROAD AT A POINT LOCATED BETWEEN MILE POST 180 AND 181. <br /> <br /> AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 11-15 ENTITLED <br /> <br /> 'BULK STORAGE; RESTRICTIONS ON UNDERGROUND STORAGE; TRUCK TRANSPORTS' OF CHAPTER 11 OF <br /> <br />THE CODE OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, 1965", WAS OFFERED BY HR, MOUNT, SECONDED BY <br />MR. JOHNSON~ AND CARRIED OVER TO THE NEXT MEETING FOR CONSIDERATION. <br /> <br /> AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 66 ENTITLED <br /> <br /> 'HEARING OF APPEAL' OF ARTICLE XVI OF APPENDIX II OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF <br /> <br />CHARLOTTESVILLE, 1965", WHICH WAS OFFERED AT THE MEETING OF THE COUNCIL ON JANUARY <br /> <br />16~ 1967, WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING RECORDED VOTE: AYES: MR. HAGGERTY, MR. JOHNSON~ <br />MR. MOUNT~ MR. RENNOLDS AND MR. VOGT. NOES: NONE. <br /> <br /> THE RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING $105,O18.14 FOR SCHOOL PURPOSES~ WHICH WAS OFFERED <br /> <br />AT THE MEETING OF THE COUNCIL ON JANUARY 16~ 1967~ WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING <br />RECORDED VOTE: AYES: MR. HAGGERTY~ MR. JOHNSON, MR. MOUNT, HR. RENNOLDS AND MR. VOGT. <br />NOES: NONE. <br /> <br /> DR. E. W. RUSHTON, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS, ADDRESSED THE COUNCIL AND PRESENTED <br />A REPORT OF THE SCHOOL BOARD RECOMMENDING THE ACQUISITION OF AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE <br />IN THE SOUTHERN PART OF THE CITY OF APPROXIMATELY FIFTEEN ACRES. MR. W. H. MARTIN <br />ADDRESSED THE COUNCIL IN SUPPORT QF THE PROPOSED SITE, AND COMPLIMENTED THE SCHOOL <br />BOARD ON THEIR ACTION. AFTER A LENGHTY DISCUSSION, DURING WHICH SEVERAL PEOPLE VOICED <br />SUPPORT OF THE SCHOOL BOARD ACTION~ A MOTION BY MR. MOUNT~ SECONDED BY MRo JOHNSON <br /> <br />THAT THE SCHOOL BOARD REPORT BE ADOPTED, AND SPREAD IN THE MINUTES, AND THE CITY MANAGER <br />BE AUTHORIZED TO START REGOTIATIONS FOR THIS PROPERTY, WAS UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED. <br /> <br /> JN A REPORT~ MADE IN OCTOBER, 1966) TO THE CHARLOTTESVILLE CiTY SCHOOL BOARD, THE <br />SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS CALLED ATTENTION TO THE FACT THAT THERE IS A DEFINITE SHORTAGE <br />OF PROPERLY LOCATED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPACE IN THE CITY. ATTENTION WAS CALLED TO THE <br />FACT THAT VACANT LAND IN PARCELS LARGE ENOUGH FOR A SCHOOL SITE ARE DI=FFICULT TO FIND. <br />IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT STEPS BE TAKEN TO ACQUIRE THE LAND NECESSARY TO MEET THE FORE- <br />SEEABLE SCHOOL BUILDING NEEDS. <br /> <br /> AS A FIRST STEP IN IMPLEMENTING THAT RECOMMENDATION THE CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY SCHOOL <br />BOARD RECOMMENDS THE PURCHASE OF AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE IN THE SOUTHERN PART OF THE <br />CITY. THE PROPOSED SITE SHOULD BE LOCATED TO SERVE A PART OF THE AREA PRESENTLY SERVED <br />BY JOHNSON SCHOOL. JN VIEW OF THE PRESENT AND PROBABLY FUTURE NEED FOR LAND~ A SITE OF <br />AT LEAST FIFTEEN ACRES 1S RECOMMENDED. <br /> <br /> THERE PROBABLY IS NO SUCH THING AS A PERFECT SCHOOL SITE. EVERY LOCATION HAS <br />CERTAIN ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES. THUS, SITE SELECTION IS A PROCESS OF WEIGHING <br />THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF POSSIBLE LOCATIONS~ AND SELECTING THE LOCATION <br />WHICH APPEARS TO OFFER THE MOST ADVANTAGES AND THE FEWEST DISADVANTAGES° SCHOOL SITES <br />SELECTED TODAY PROBABLY WILL BE IN USE FOR FIFTY YEARS OR MORE. THEREFORE> EVERY EFFORT <br />MUST BE MADE TO CONSIDER PROBABLE FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS AS WELL AS THE PRESENT SITUATION. <br /> <br /> <br />