Laserfiche WebLink
<br />NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING <br /> <br />A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY COUNCIL WILL BE <br />HELD ON Tuesday, November 25, 2008 AT 2:00 p.m. IN THE “City Space” in the <br />Charlottesville Community Design Center, 100 5th Street, S.E. (downtown mall side of <br />the Market Street Parking Garage). <br /> <br />THE PROPOSED AGENDA IS AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br /> Meeting with the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, Rivanna Water and <br /> Sewer Authority and Albemarle County Service Authority regarding the water <br /> supply plan <br /> <br />BY ORDER OF THE MAYOR BY Jeanne Cox <br /> <br />CITY SPACE – November 25, 2008 <br /> <br /> Council met in special session on this date with the following members present: <br />Dr. Brown, Ms. Edwards, Mr. Huja, Mr. Norris, Mr. Taliaferro. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mike Gaffney, Chair of the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority, presented a <br />background summary of the permitting process. He stated that the environmental permits <br />for the Ragged Mountain Dam and the South Fork pipeline have been issued by both the <br />Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and the US Army Corps of <br />Engineers (the Corps). It was important to note that RWSA submitted an application to <br />these agencies in 2006 after receiving the unanimous support from each of the same four <br />boards meeting today. The federal and state agencies performed a thorough review of <br />RWSA’s application in accordance with federal law that strongly emphasized <br />environmental protection. He said the purpose of today’s meeting is to discuss how we <br />might revisit the approved community water supply plan in light of recent challenges. He <br />reminded everyone that federal and state agencies have already performed a similar <br />review prior to issuing the permit. Any studies must align with the objectives of federal <br />law as well as local objectives. The federal objectives include protection of streams, <br />wetlands, endangered species and their habitat, cultural and historic resources, and in- <br />stream flows for our rivers. He said he believes that City Council’s intent to call for <br />additional study is aligned with those objectives, as their resolution emphasized the need <br />to remain consistent with the context of the approved permits. He said that on November <br />3, City Council asked RWSA to broaden the expert review of the project to include water <br />conservation and a review of the reasonableness of water demand projections, a dredging <br />feasibility study, and review of the pipeline alternatives in addition to the dam review. <br />Mayor Norris will explain City Council’s request in more detail. Mr. Gaffney also <br />commented that today’s objective is to engage in an active dialog in an attempt to reach <br />consensus of the four boards on the scope of the expert review and then give clear <br />direction to RWSA on how to proceed. He said some have commented that they wanted <br />the study to cost less. If that is the group consensus, he asked that the focus be on how to <br />simplify the scope of work outline, while still achieving clearly-stated objectives. <br /> <br /> Mr. Norris noted that City Council is not asking for an extensive delay in this <br />project, but said there is an opportunity now to obtain better information that will guide <br />us as the project moves forward and to get an objective, outside opinion on the most <br />environmentally and economically responsible path forward for the community’s water <br />supply plan. He said there is also time to get better information and make better <br />decisions since it will be at least one to one and a half years before construction begins on <br />the Ragged Mountain Dam. <br /> <br /> Mr. Norris said he did not believe that the studies would amount to $750,000 to <br />$1 million in cost, nor delay the project 12 months or longer as suggested by others. He <br />said he feels that there is the opportunity and time now to gather this information, and <br />City Council recommends that this is the best process to undertake at this time. <br /> <br /> Mr. Kenneth Boyd, Chair of the Board of Supervisors, said City Council appeared <br />to be questioning the work that has been done previously, with the exception of the data <br /> <br />