Laserfiche WebLink
48 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION RE: <br />AUTHORIZING MAYOR <br />TO SIGN LAND <br />PURCHASE CONTRACT <br />FOR HIGH SCHOOL <br />SPORTS FACILITY <br /> <br />RESOLUTION RE: <br />AUTHORIZING MAYOR TO <br />SIGN EASEMENT FOR <br />ACCESS TO PROPERTY OF <br />WADE CRAWFORD <br /> <br />RESOLUTION RE: <br />AUTHORIZING SIGNING <br />OF TRANSIT CONTRACT <br />WITH UNIVERSITY OF <br />VIRGINIA <br /> <br />ORDINANCE RE~ <br />CONFORMING REQUIREMENTS <br />OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT <br /> <br /> MR. ALBRO STATED THAT IT IS CORRECT THAT THE PURPOSE OF THE REFERENDUM <br /> <br /> IS TO RECEIVE ADVICEI IT WAS PUT TO THE PEOPLE AND THE PEOPLE SPOKE. MR. <br /> <br />ALBRO STATED THAT THE PURPOSE OF THE; SECOND REFERENDUM, IN MIS OPINION., <br /> <br />,IS BECAUSE THE RESU'LTS OF-THE F~.RST REFERENDUM_DID NOT SUIT CERTAIN - <br /> <br />PEOPLE IN CERTAIN PARTIES. HE STATED THAT NO GROUNd. RULES WERE <br /> <br />EXPRESSED BY ANY ONE. FOR THE-FIRST REFEREND-UM. HE SUGG. ESTED THAT <br /> <br />THE SECOND REFERENDUM IS AN"IN~'LT_AND A WA-STE OF THE TAXPAYERS MONEY..'" <br /> <br />, MBS. GLEASON C'0MMENTED, STATING THAT IT IS IMPORTANT TO <br /> <br />STATE WHAT IS NECESSARY TO ACCEPT THE ADVICE OF THE REFERENDUM. <br /> <br />SHE ALSO STATED THAT THE SMALL PERCENTAGE O~ THOSE VOTERS WHO VOTED <br /> <br />ON TM~REEEREND_U.M WAS NOT INDICATIVE OF THE OPINION OF ENOUGH PEOPLE <br /> <br />IN THE CITY TO MERI'T CHANGING THE ENTIRE SYSTEM. <br /> <br /> DR. HALL STATED THAT, ALTHOUGH HE IS NOT OPPOSED TO THE SECOND <br /> <br />REFERENDUM, THERE ARE QUESTIONS HE HAS THAT ARE STILL NOT ANSWERED IN <br /> <br />THE RESOLUTION PRESENTED. HE REQUESTED THAT THE RESOLUTION BE HELD <br /> <br />OVER TO COUNCI'~'S 'NEXT MEETING. <br /> <br /> MR. HENDRIX STATED THAT IN ORDER TO MEET THE SIXTY DAY NOTICE <br /> <br />TIME REQUIREMENT, THE RESOLUTION WOULD HAVE TO BE PASSED AT THIS <br /> <br />MEETING. <br /> <br /> MS. HAUGHEY, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY, INDICATED THAT IF THE <br /> <br />RESOLUTION WAS NOT VOTED UPON AT THIS MEETING, COUNCIL COULD <br /> <br />CONVENE WITHIN THE ~EXT TWO DAYS AND STILL BE WITHIN THE REQUIRED <br /> <br />TIME LIMITATIONS. <br /> <br /> UPON MR. HENDRIX'S SUGGESTION, MRS. GLEASON, VICE-MAYOR <br /> <br />CALLED FOR A FIVE MINUTE RECESS. <br /> <br /> MR. 'CONOVER STATED THAT COUNCIL SEEMED HESITATNT TO ACT ON <br /> <br />THIS ISSUE BECAUSE OF THE MAYOR'S ABSENCE AND THE.KNOW~EDGE.OF HIS <br /> <br />DEEP CONCERN ABOUT THIS ISSUE. <br /> <br /> THE MEETING WAS RECESSED. <br /> <br /> MRS. GLEASON RECONVENED THE MEETING, INDICATING COUNCIL WOULD <br /> <br />MOVE ON TO THE NEXT AGENDA ITEM AND RETURN TO THE RESOLUTION <br /> <br />REGARDING THE ADVISORY REFERENDUM WHEN THE MAYOR ARRIVED. <br /> <br /> MR. HENDRIX STATED THAT THE MAYOR HAD DISCUSSED THE PURCHASE OF <br /> <br />THE PROPERTY FROM MR. NUNLRY FOR $420,000.00. HE RECOMMENDED THE <br /> <br />AUTHORIZATION OF SIGNING THE CONTRACT, INDICATING THE PURCHASE DOES <br /> <br />PROVIDE A CONSIDERABLE GIFT BY MR. NUNLEY. ON MOTION BY MR..ALBRO, <br /> <br />SECONDED BY MR. CONOVER, COUNCIL UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE RESOLUTION. <br /> <br /> DR. HALL QUESTIONED THE LOCATION OF THIS EASEMENT AND SINCE <br /> <br />NO PLAT WAS AVAILABLE, COUNCIL AGREED TO CARRY THE RESOLUTION OVER <br /> <br />TO THE NEXT MEETING FOR CONSIDERATION. <br /> <br /> AT THIS TIME MRS. GLEASON TURNED THE CHAIR OVER TO MAYOR BUCK. <br /> <br /> ON MOTION BY MR. ALBRO, SECONDED BY MRS. GLEASDN, COUNCIL <br /> <br />UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED THE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE <br /> <br />TRANSIT CONTRACT WITH THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA. <br /> <br /> THE ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN 0RBINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN SECTION <br /> <br />9-5 OF THE COBE OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, 1976, RELATING TO <br /> <br />LECTIDN DISTRICTS AND POLLING PLACES." WHICH WAS OFFERED AT <br /> <br />THE MEETING OF MARCH 1ST WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES~ <br /> <br /> <br />