Laserfiche WebLink
i33 <br />COUNCIL CHAMBER - JULY ii, 1955 <br />THE COUNCIL MET IN REGULAR SESSION ON THIS DATE WITH THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS <br />PRESENT: MR. OAVIS, MR. FORGES, MR. HILL, MR. MICHIE AND MR. WEINBERG. ABSENT: NONE. <br />THE MINUTE5 OF THE MEETINGS OF JUNE 2Q, 1955 AND JUNE 23, 1955 WERE READ AND <br />APPROVED. <br />MR. HARRY MICHAELS ADDRESSED THE COUNCIL ON BEHALF OF THE JACKSON PARK HOTEL <br />MATTER RES REZONING CO., INC. PROTESTING THE REZONING OF THE HOTEL COMPANY~S PARCEL OF LAND SOUTH OF <br />ON ROUTE 1~ 250, WEST <br />DEFERRED ROUTE #250 WEST. AFTER A LENGHTY DISCUSSION, A MOTION BY MR. MICHIE, SECONDED BY <br />MR. FORGES, THAT ACTION BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING OF THE COUNCIL, WAS <br />UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED. <br />ON MOTION BY MR. MICHIE, SECONDED BY MR, HILL, THE FOLLOWING COUNTY WATER <br />COUNTY WATER <br />CONNECTIONS APPROVED <br />CONNECTIONS WERE APPROVED: <br />O . W . UNDERWOOD <br />CARL BARNETT <br />H. L. SETTLE <br />C. T. LASLEY <br />VA. HOME BUILDERS (2} <br />NICK SAKELL (2} <br />ALBEMARLE HOMES, INC. (3) <br />R. A. SAUNDERS <br />STARLING RE10 <br />BEL AIR <br />RUTlEOGE <br />WILLARD ()RIVE <br />DAIRY KOAD <br />RUTLEDGE <br />MONROE PARK <br />SHERIDAN AVE. <br />MARTIN STREET <br />KEITH VALLEY ROAD <br />ON MOTION BY MR. HILL, SECONDED BY MR. DAVIS, THE FOLLOWING REPORT WAS <br />UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED: <br />TO THE CITY COUNCIL, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA <br />YOUR COMMITTEE APPOINTED TO CONSIDER THE VARIOUS MATTERS RAISED BY MR. C. E. <br />MORAN, CLERK OF THE CORPORATION COURT, IN HIS RECENT APPEARANCE BEFORE THE COUNCIL, <br />RESPECTFULLY REPORTS: <br />(1} ADDITIONAL SPACE - JuoGe SADLER IS MOVING HiS OFFICE TO A ROOM ON <br />TWE SECOND FLOOR OF THE COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING WHICH WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR USE <br />COMMITTEE REPORTS BY MR. MORAN ANU FOR STORAGE BY HIM OF CERTAIN RECORDS. THE ADDITIONAL SPACE <br />CLERK OF CORP. CT. WILL ee RENTED FOR THE SAME SUM THAT HAS HERETOFORE BEEN ALLOWED JUDGE SADLER <br />FOR RENT. THIS SOLVES, FOR THE TIME BEING, THE PROBLEM OF SPACE THOUGH THE <br />CLERKS OFFICE iS CONSTANTLY GETTING MORE AND MORE CROWDED AND FURTHER <br />DIFFICULTY WILL DOUBTLESS ARISE IN A FEW YEARS TIME. IT WOULD SEEM DESIRABLE <br />TO GET ADDITIONAL SPACE IN THE COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING iF SUCH SPACE BECOMES <br />AVAILABLE AND, IF POSSIBLE, TO MOVE THE ENTIRE CLERKS OFFICE INTO LARGER <br />QUARTERS EVEN THOUGH IT SHOULD BE NECESSARY TO MOVE TO THE SECOND FLOOR. <br />(2} SHELVING - MR. MORAN HAS ORDERED THE NECESSARY ADDITIONAL SHELVING <br />AND THIS PROBLEM SEEM5 SATISFACTORILY SOLVED. <br />(3) INDEXING - MR. CARTER STATES THAT HE DOES NOT EXPECT ANY ADDITIONAL <br />PAY FOR COMPLETING THE NEW INDEX WHICH HE STARTED ON SEVERAL YEARS AGO. HE <br />FULLY INTENDS TO COMPLETE IT BUT THE J08 MAY TAKE AS MUCH AS TWO ADDITIONAL <br />YEARS. YOUR COMMITTEE BELIEVES THAT UNDER ALL THE CIRCUMSTANCES MR. CARTER <br />SHOULD PROBABLY 8E PAID SOME ADDITIONAL SUM FOR THIS WORK THOUGH NOT AT <br />THE MONTHLY RATE HERETO FORE PAID HIM. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT THE COUNCIL APPROVE <br />IN PRINCIPLE THE IDEA OF P14YING MR. CARTER AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT BUT THAT THE <br />DETERMINATION OF THIS AMOUNT AND THE PAYMENT THEREOF BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE WORK <br />HA5 BEEN COMPLETED AND THAT THE SUGGESTION BE MADE TO MR. CARTER THAT, IF THE <br />WORK IS COMPLETED SOONER THAN ANTICIPATED, TH15 FACT WILL INCLINE THE COUNCIL <br />TO BE MORE GENEROUS 1N FIXING THE ADDITIONAL SUM RATHER THAN LE55 S0. <br />(4) ASSISTANT - WE HAVE DISCUSSED WITH MR. MORAN SEVERAL TIMES THE PROBLEM <br />OF SECURING AN ADDITIONAL ASSISTANT WHO MIGHT BECOME A DEPUTY ANO HAVE MADE <br />SEVERAL SUGGESTIONS TO HIM IN REGARD THERETO. WE BELIEVE THAT NO ACTION BY THE <br />COUNCIL IS DESIRABLE iN THIS CONNECTION UNTIL MR. MORAN HAS SELECTED SOMEONE AND <br />COMES BACK TO COUNCIL WITH A DEFINITE PROPOSITION AS TO THE AMOUNT TO BE PA10 <br />SUCH AN ASSISTANT. WE HAVE INDICATED THAT THE COMMITTEE WOULD PROBABLY LOOK WITH <br />FAVOR UPON THE EMPLOYMENT OF AN ASSISTANT WHO MIGHT ULTIMATELY BECOME A DEPUTY, <br />PROVfDEO THE PAY WAS NOT TOO HIGH AT FIRST. <br />(5) PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT - WE HAVE DISCUSSED THE PROPOSED BILL TO <br />CHANGE IN CERTAIN RESPECTS THE METHOD OF COMPENSATING THE CLERK AND APPROVE <br />THE DRAFT BILL ATTACHED TO THIS REPORT. THIS IS SUBSTANTIALLY THE BILL AS <br />PRESENTED BY MR. MORAN TO THE COUNCIL WITH AN AMENDMENT SUGGESTED BY YOUR <br />COMMITTEE REDUCING THE MINIMUM AMOUNT TO BE PAID THE CLERK AND WITH A CHANGE <br />SUGGESTED BY MR. MORAN UNDER WHICH THE COMPENSATION OF THE DEPUTY AND EMPLOYEES <br />WOULD CONTINUE TO BE FIXED BY THE STATE COMPENSATION BOARD AS HERETOFORE RATHER <br />THAN BY COUNCIL AS SUGGESTED IN THE ORIGINAL DRAFT BILL PRESENTED BY MR. MORAN• <br />IN SUGGESTING THE REDUCTION OF THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF SALARY FOR THE CLERK IT <br />WAS NOT THE THOUGHT OF YOUR COMMITTEE TO OPEN THE WAY FOR A REDUCTION OF MR. <br />MORAN~S SALARY BUT RATHER IT WAS THOUGHT THAT IF AND WHEN MR. MORAN RETIRES <br />HIS SUCCESSOR, WHO MIGHT BE RELATIVELY YOUNS AND INEXPERIENCED, SHOULD PERHAPS <br />NOT BE PAID AS MUCH AS MR. MORAN IS NOW RECEIVING. <br />RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, <br />THOMAS J. MICHIE (SIGNED) <br />