Laserfiche WebLink
goo <br />ON CHERRY AVENUE TO JAMES B. HARLOW. HE RECOMMENDED THAT THE MAYOR BE <br />AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THIS DEED PROVIDED JAMES B. HARLOW, A. C. HARLOW, <br />C. A. LAMBERT AND THEIR WIVES AGREE TO THE PROPOSAL. ON MOTION BY <br />MR. DAVIS, SECONDED BY MR. SCRIBNER, THE FOREGOING RECOMMENDATION WAS <br />UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. <br />MR. HAROLD V. EASTER ADDRESSED THE COUNCIL AND PRESENTED A PETITION <br />MATTER RE: PROPOSAL <br />NEW BELMONT BRIDGE - REQUEST <br />FOR POSTPONEMENT OF <br />CONSTRUC710N <br />SIGNED BY FIVE PEOPLE REQUESTING THAT THE CITY POSTPONE ANY FURTHER ACTION <br />OR COMMITMENTS ON THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW BELMONT BRIDGE UNTIL <br />HIS PROPOSAL IS CONSIDERED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THE CITY MANAGER <br />REMINDED THE COUNCIL THAT THOROUGH STUDY AND PLANNING HAS BEEN GIVEN THIS <br />PROJECT AND THAT THE CITY IS COMMITTED TO THE BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROADS, THE <br />STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT AND THE C & O RAILWAY COMPANY FOR ITS COMPLETION, <br />ANO STRONGLY URGED THE COUNCIL TO CONTINUE WITH THE PROJECT. THE MAYOR <br />STATED THAT THE COUNCIL WOULD BE GLAD TO RECEIVE A REPORT FROM THE PLANNING <br />COMMISSION. <br />THE RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING $180,340.98 FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES FOR THE <br />APPROPRIATION - FOURTH <br />QUARTER - EDUCATIONAL <br />PURPOSES <br />FOURTH QUARTER ENDING JUNE 3O, 1960, WHICH WAS OFFERED AT THE MEETING OF THE <br />COUNCIL ON MARCH 31, 1960, WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING RECORDED VOTE: <br />AYES: MR. COLEMAN, MR. DAVIS, MR. MICHIE, Mf~t. SCRIBNER AND MR. WEINBERG. <br />NOES: NONE. <br />ON MOTION THE MEETING ADJOURNED. <br />~ ~` I <br />CLERK PRE DENT <br />COUNCIL CHAMBER - APRIL 18, 1960 <br />THE COUNCIL MET IN REGULAR SESSION ON THIS DATE WITH THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS <br />PRESENT: MR. COLEMAN, MR. DAVIS, MR. MICHIE, MR. $CRIBNER AND MR. WEINBERG. <br />ABSENT: NONE. <br />THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF APRIL 4, 1960 WERE READ AND APPROVED. <br />A PUBLIC HEARING WAS HELD ON THIS DATE ON THE HOUSING AUTHORITY~S APPLICATION <br />PUBLIC HEARING RE: <br />HOUSING AUTHORITY~S <br />APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL <br />TO TRANSACT BUSINESS <br />FOR APPROVAL TO TRANSACT BUSINESS AND EXERCISE POWERS UNDER THE TERMS OF <br />TITLE 36 OF THE VIRGINIA CODE. SEVERAL PERSONS ADDRESSED THE COUNCIL DISCUSSING <br />THE MERITS OF PUBLIC HOUSING. THE MAYOR INFORMED THESE PEOPLE THAT THE COUNCIL S <br />ACTION IN THIS MATTER IS BOUND BY SECTION 14 A OF THE CITY CHARTER AND A REFEREN- <br />DUM MUST BE HELD. ON MOTION BY MR. WEINBERG, SECONDED BY MR. SCRIBNER, THE <br />FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED: <br />BE IT RESOLVED THAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14 A OF THE CHARTER <br />RESOLUTION RE: <br />CITY ATTY. DIRECTED <br />TO PETITION FOR A <br />REFERENDUM <br />OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, FOLLOWING APPLICATION BY THE <br />HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR APPROVAL TO TRANSACT BUSINESS AND EXERCISE <br />POWERS AS PROVIDED BY STATE LAW AND FOLLOWING A PETITION BY OVER <br />lOO QUALIFIED VOTERS OF THIS CITY CALLING FOR A REFERENDUM ON <br />SUCH APPLICATION THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY BE AND HE IS HEREBY <br />DIRECTED TO PETITION THE CORPORATION COURT FOR A REFERENDUM <br />TO BE HELD, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 24-141 of THE <br />$TATE CODE, ON SUCH APPLICATION. <br />A MOTION BY MR. SCRIBNER, SECONDED BY MR. DAVIS, THAT THE COUNCIL, IN <br />ITS PETITION, SUGGEST THE WORDING FOR THE QUESTION ON THE BALLOT, WAS <br />UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED. <br />