|
23'O
<br />
<br />ApPROP- APPROP-
<br />RIATION RIATION
<br />1972~73 1971-72
<br />
<br />INCREASE
<br />
<br />DEC RE ASR
<br />
<br />RJBLIC SERVICES
<br />MISCELLANEOUS
<br />
<br />TOTALS
<br />
<br />295,361 . 00 t, 093,167.00 202, 1 94. O0 .00
<br />34 037.07 --_ 77¢046.00 .00 43¢009.O0_
<br />91 O, 907, 110.20 ~1, 502, 825. 80 ~63,368. O0
<br />
<br />912,346,568.00
<br />
<br />CAP ! TAL
<br />
<br /> WATER SEWER GAS IMPROVEMENT
<br />
<br />DEP ART ME NT DE P. ARTMENT DEP ARTME NT FUND
<br />
<br /> 1 21, OO8.00 .O0 11 0,349.00 5,413, 178.00
<br /> 985,000. O0 295,000. O0 2,750, 000. O0 1,065,000. O0
<br /> O0 ! 53,338 · O0 .00 .00
<br /> · 4,529,780.00
<br />
<br /> 559,568 · O0 353,888-. O0 2, 129, 316.00 . O0
<br /> 212, 51 2.50 94,450.00 . O0 . O0
<br /> 1 53: 338. O0 . O0 50_0~ z O00.0_0_ . O0
<br /> 91 80,589.50 $ .00 .$231,033.00 ~1,948,398.00
<br />
<br />BALANCE - JULY 1, 1972
<br />REVENUE
<br />TRANSFERS
<br />EXPENDITURES:
<br />OPE R AT I O N
<br />DEBT CHARGES
<br />TRANSFERS
<br />
<br />BALANCE - JUNE 30, 1973
<br />
<br />REVENUE - SOURCE
<br />
<br /> FOR OPERATION OF CITY SCHOOLS
<br />REVENUE REVENUE DECREASE
<br />1 972-73 1 971'-72 INCREASE
<br />
<br />STATE FUNDS
<br />FEDERAL FUNDS
<br />STATE SALES TAX
<br />TUITION
<br />Loc AL FUNDS
<br />ALL OTHER
<br />
<br />TOT ALS
<br />
<br />,663,Ot 9.00 ¢1,402,456.00 9260*563' O0 .00
<br />1 61,740. OD 1 69,966. OD . O0 8,226. O0
<br />583,280.00 495,000. OD 88,280.00 .00
<br />24,000. O0 25,000.00 .00 1,000, 00
<br />4,004,024. O0 3,655,496.00 348,528.00 . O0
<br />22¢ 000.00 ~ 22¢ 000.OO .00 .00
<br /> 95,769,918.O0 ~697,371 .OO ~ 9,226.00
<br />
<br />$6,458,063. O0
<br />
<br />EXPENDITURES
<br />
<br />EXPENDITURES
<br />
<br />ADHI N I STRAT ION
<br />INSTRUCTIONAL COST
<br />PUPIL TRANSPORTATION
<br />OPERATION & MAINTENANCE OF
<br /> SCHOOL PLANT
<br />FIXED CHARGES
<br />CAPITAL OUTLAY
<br />SCHOOL FOOD SERVICES
<br /> ALL OTHER
<br />
<br />TOTALS
<br />
<br />1972-73 1971-72
<br />
<br />INCREASE
<br />
<br />DECREASE
<br />
<br />9173,518.00 9154, 957. 00 ~ 1 8,561.00 .00
<br />5,1 63,067. OD 4, 749,745. O0 413,322. OD . O0
<br />35,910.00 ' 30,O18.00 5,892. OD .00
<br />
<br />625, 61 9. O0 557,444. OD 68, 175. O0 . O0
<br />1 90, 658. O0 1 59, 41 6. O0 31,242. O0 . O0
<br />1 59,291. OD 106,489. O0 52,802 · O0 . O0
<br />100, O00. O0 . O0 1 00, O00.00 .00
<br />10~000.O0 .00 10~000.00 .00
<br />
<br />9699, 994. O0
<br />
<br />96,458,063. OD 95,758,069. O0
<br />
<br />· O0
<br />
<br />ANNUAL TAX LEVY
<br />ORDINANCE CARRIED
<br />oVER
<br />
<br />ORDINANCE CARRIED OVER:
<br />SEC. 11.1-6 - LEVY OF
<br />TAX - AMOUNT
<br />
<br />REQUEST RE: DISPLAY
<br />OF FLOWERS ON SIDEWALK
<br />
<br />REQU,ES.T DENIED RE:
<br />HOT DOG STAND
<br />
<br />MATTER RE: AREA WIDE
<br />COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
<br />
<br /> AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "ANNUAL TAX LEVY IMPOS lNG TAXES ON PROPERTY AND MACHINERY
<br />AND TOOLS FOR THE PAYMENT OF INTEREST AND RETIREMENT ON THE CITY DEBT, FOR THE SUPPORT
<br />OF THE CITY GOVERNMENT AND CITY SCHOOLS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES", WAS OFFERED BY MR.
<br />WRIGHT, SECONDED BY MR. FIFE, AND CARRIED OVER TO THE NEXT MEETING FOR CONSIDERATION.
<br /> AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN SECTION 11.1-6 OF THE
<br />CODE OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, 1965, ENTITLED LEVY OF TAXi AMOUNT", WAS OFFERED
<br />BY MR. BARBOUR, SECONDED BY MR. DAVIS, AND CARRIED OVER TO THE NEXT MEETING FOR CONSIDERATION.
<br /> [VtR. L. F. WlDNER, MANAGER OF F. W. WOOLWORTH COMPANY, ADDRESSED THE COUNCIL AND RE-
<br /> QUESTED PERMISSION TO DISPLAY FLOWERS AND MERCHANDISE ON THE SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF HIS STORE.
<br /> ON MOTION BY MR. DAVIS, SECONDED BY MR. FIFE, PERMISSION WAS GRANTED TO ANY MERCHANT WHO
<br /> NORMALLY DISPLAYS FLOWERS-ON THE SIDEWALK, TO DISPLAY FLOWERS ON THE SIDEWALK FOR A PERIOD
<br /> OF FORTY-FIVE (45) DAYS, PROVIDED~ SUCH DISPLAY DOES NOT EXTEND FURTHER THAN TWO FEET FROM
<br /> THE BUILDING LINE, AND PROVIDED FURTHER, THAT MERCHANTS DISPLAYING SUCH MERCHANDISE AGREE'TO
<br /> SAVE THE CITY HARMLESS FROM ALL CLAIMS THAT MAY ARISE BY REASON OF SUCH DISPLAY.
<br /> THE MANAGER OF Mc CRoRYwS STORE ALSO REQUESTED PERMISSION TO ERECT A 7' X 7~ HOT DOG
<br /> STAND ON THE SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF HIS STORE ON SATURDAY, APRIL 29, 1972. ON MOTION BY
<br /> MR. FIFE, SECONDED BY MR. WRIGHT, PERMISSION WAS DENIED.
<br /> DR. CHARLES GLEASO% DR. MORTON WILHELM AND DR. GEORGE ~3ORE ADDRESSED THE COUNCIL AND
<br /> PRESENTED AN AREA WIDE COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH PLAN~ OBJECTIVES OF WHICH ARE MORE EFF~CIENT USE
<br /> OF HEALTH CARE FACILITIES AND COORDINATION. DR. GLEASON STATED THAT TO IMPLEMENT THE PLAN
<br /> THE ENDORSEMENT OF THE LOCALITIES IN DISTRICT 10 IS NEEDED. THE CITY MANAGER STATED THAT HE
<br /> ENDORSED COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING WHEN PROPERLY DONE. ON MOTION BY MR. ~RIGHT, SECONDED BY MR.
<br /> BARBOUR, THE PLAN AS PRESENTED WAS ENDORSED IN PRINCIPLE.
<br />
<br />
<br />
|