1975-04-07 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

48O RESOLUTION RE: TELEPHONE RATE CASE ORDINANCE RE: TERMS - CH'VILLE-ALB. REGIONAL JAIL BOARD ORDINANCE RE: COMPOSITION BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AUTHORIZING WORKING DRAWINGS FOR THE CENTRAL PLACE ON MOTION BY MR. GILLIAM, SECONDED BY MR. VAN YAHRES THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED. WHEREAS, THE CHESAPEAKE AND POTOMAC TELEPHONE COMPANY OF VIRGINIA HAS FILED AN APPLICATION WITH THE STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION SEEKING AUTHORITY TO INCREASE THE COST OF PAY STATION CALLS TO 20¢, AND TO ESTABLISH A SCHEDLLE OF CHARGES FOR CALLS TO DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE SERVICE; AND WHEREAS, THE COMMISSION BY ITS ORDER OF FEBRUARY 11, 1975, HAS EXPANDED THE PROCEEDINGS CONSIDERING THE APPLICATION, CASE NO. 19452, TO INCLUDE ALL TELEPHONE COMPANIES IN THE STATE, INCLUDING CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY. OF VIRGINIA SERVING CHARLOTTESVILLE; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, THAT THE COUNCIL SET FORTH ITS POSITION ON THE PUBLIC INTEREST INVOLVED IN SUCH CASE, AS FOLLOWS: THE COUNCIL BELIEVED IT HIGHLY PROBABLY THAT THE CAPITAL INVESTMENT IN NEW EQUIPMENT REQUIRED TO INCREASE PAY-STATION CALLS TO 20¢, AND THE GREATLY INCREASED ADMINISTRATIVE COST WHICH WOULD BE INCURRED BY THE INSTITUTION OF SEPARATE CHARGES FOR DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE CALLS MAY MAKE SUCH INCREASED OR ADDITIONAL CHARGES ECONOMICALLY UNWISE. IT IS THEREFORE STRONGLY URGED THAT'THE COMMISSION CAREFULLY CONSIDER WHETHER THE REVENUE TO BE RECEIVED BY THE TELEPHONE COMPANIES FROM SUCH ADDITIONAL' CHARGES IS SUFFICIENT TO JUSTIFY THE INCREASED CAPITAL AND OPERATING EXPENSES WHICH WOULD RESULT THEREFROM. IN THE VIEW OF THIS COUNCIL, THE PUBLIC INTEREST WOULD BETTER BE SERVED BY CONTINUING TO INCLUDE THE COSTS OF PAY-STATION AND DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE SERVICES IN THE TELEPHONE COMPANIES' OVERALL RATE BASES, PERMITTING THEM TO BE RECOVERED CNA SYSTEM-WIDE BASIS, RATHER THAN AS DIRECT USER CHARGES. THESE SERVICES HAVE A GENERAL BENEFIT IN TERMS OF THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCEs SAFETY AND WELFARE AND THE FOSTERING OF TRADE AND COMMERCE, WHICH EXCEEDS THE IMMEDIATE DIRECT BENEFIT TO THE USER. THEREFORE, IT IS APPROPRIATE THAT THE COST INVOLVED IN PROVIDING SUCH SERVICE BE SPREAD OVER AS BROAD A SEGMENT OF SOCIETY AS POSSIBLE, WHICH IS BEST ACCOMPLISHED BY INCLUDING THEM IN THE TELEPHONE COMPANIES' TOTAL COST OF SERVICE. IN THE EVENT THAT THE COMMISSION DOES FIND IT ADVISABLE TO PERMIT DIRECT USER CHARGES FOR DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE CALLS, FAIRNESS WOULD DICTATE THAT SUCH CHARGES NOT BE IMPOSED IN ANY INSTANCE WHERE THE NtJVIBER SOUGHT IS NOT IN THE CURREN]I_Y AVAILABLE EDITION OF THE LOCAL TELEPHONE DIRECTORY. IT SHOULD BE RECOCC4IZED THAT A NUMBER OF COMMUNITIES IN THE STATE HAVE A LARGE TRANSIENT SEGMENT OF THE POPULATION, AND THAT THE RESULTING CHANGES IN TELEPHONE LISTINGS OFTEN DO NOT COINGIDE WITH THE ISSUANCES OF A NEW TELEPHONE DIRECTORY. IN A UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY LIKE CHARLO]-FESVILLE, FOR EXAMPLE, A SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF TELEPHONE SUBSCRIBERS CHANGE RESIDENCES, ARRIVE, OR LEAVE WITH THE BEGINNING AND END OF THE UNIVERSITY'S ACADEMIC YEAR. THE NEW TELEPHONE DIRECTORY IS NOT PUBLISHED, HOWEVER, UNTIL NOVEMBER OF EACH YEAR. THUS FOR A NUMBER OF MONTHS CORRECT TELEPHONE LISTINGS FOR A CONSIDERABLE SEGMENT OF THE COMMUNITY ARE UNAVAILABLE EXCEPT THROUGH DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE. TO PENALIZE TELEPHONE CUSTOMERS WHO MUST AVAIL THEMSELVES OF DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE SERVICES DURING SUCH TIME IS WHOLLY INEQUITABLE. FOR THE FOREGOING REASONS THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE RESPECTFULLY URGES THE STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION TO DENY THE REQUESTED PERMISSION TO INCREASE PAY'STATION CHARGES AND INSTITUTE CHARGES FOR DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE CALLS. IN LIEU OF SUCH CHARGES, THE TELEPHONE COMPANINES SHOULD BE PERMITTED TO INCLUDE THEIR ACTUAL COSTS INCURRED IN PROVIDING SUCH SERVICES IN THEIR RESPECTIVE GENERAL RATE BASES, THEREBY ALLOCATING SUCH COSTS ON A SYSTEM-WIDE BASIS. IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SHOULD THE COMMISSION INSTITUTE A SCHEDULE OF CHARGES FOR DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE THE COUNCIL URGES THAT THE LIST OF EXEMPT CATEGORIES BE EXPANDED TO INCLUDE ANY CALL FOR DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE WHEREIN THE LISTING SOUGHT IS UNAVAILABLE IN THE CURRENT PUBLISHED DIRECTORY. AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED '' AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, 1965, BY ADDING IN CHAPTER 24 AN ARTICLE NUMBERED 24-16 AND 24-17 RELATING TO ESTABLISHMENT OF TERMS FOR THE CHARLO-FFESVILLE-ALBEMARLE REGIONAL JAIL BOARD," WHICH WAS OFFERED AT THE MEETING OF THE COUNCIL ON MARCH 17, 1975, WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING RECORDED VOTE. AYES: MR. BARBOUR, MR.FIFE, MR. GILLIAM, MRS. RINEHART AND MR. VAN YAHRES. NOES: NONE. AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED '' AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT SECTION 2-172.1 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, 1965, RELATING TO THE COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION," WHICH WAS OFFERED AT THE MEETING OF THE COUNCIL ON APRIL 3, 1975, WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING RECORDED VOTE. AYES: MR. BARBOUR, MR. FIFE, MR. GILLAIM, MRS. RINEHART AND MR. VAN YAHRES. NOES: NONE, THE MAYOR VACATED THE CHAIR AND MRS. RINEHART PRESIDED. THE CITY MANAGER PRESENTED THE ARCHITECT'S RENDERING OF THE PROPOSED CENTRAL PLACE. ON MOTION BY MR. VAN YAHRES, SECONDED BY MR. BARBOUR THE CONCEPT OF THE CENTRAL PLACE WAS ENDORSED AND THE CITY MANAGER WAS AUTHORIZED TO HAVE WORKING DRAWINGS PREPARED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE. AYES: MR. BARBOUR AND MR. VAN YAHRES. NOES: NONE.