My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-07-15
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2002
>
2002-07-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2004 10:08:09 AM
Creation date
10/12/2004 5:11:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
7/15/2002
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br />behind closed doors. Mr. Repass said there was never a public hearing on whether to <br />build the transfer station. Mr. Repass recommended that Council pass a rule requiring <br />that detailed information be made available to the public at least fi ve days in advance <br />when holding a public hearing. <br /> <br /> Mr. Ben Bates, 106 Cameron Lane, suggested that in addition to a new traffic <br />study regarding the University's proposed parking garage, that Council look into whether <br />the Three Party Agreement has been vio lated by the University, and urged the Council to <br />take the University to court and get an injunction to stop the garage until issues are <br />resolved. <br /> <br /> Ms. Sonja Gilke, 123 Cameron Lane, said that the University of Virginia expects <br />students to obey the honor code, but does not feel the University is honoring the <br />institution, neighbors, the City, students and the legacy of Thomas Jefferson. Ms. Gilke <br />recommended that Council remind the University of the honor code they should be <br />following. <br /> <br /> Ms. Willa Lawall, 108 Bollingwood, said that a petition has been signed by over <br />1,500 City residents representing eight neighborhood association, requesting that the <br />garage project be abandoned. Ms. Lawall said the garage will impose inconveniences on <br />residents and busine sses, and feels Council needs to do something now. <br /> <br /> Ms. Julie Gronlund, 1934 Lewis Mountain Road, Vice President of the Lewis <br />Mountain Neighborhood Association, asked Council to take a strong position and insist <br />that a traffic study be completed before co nstruction of the garage begins. Ms. Gronlund <br />said that if Council does not tell the University what it wants it puts the City in a position <br />of weakness. <br /> <br /> Referring to Mr. Repass's comments about the downtown service district, Mr. <br />Cox invited him to atte nd Council's work session on that topic and said he is open to <br />modifying his position. <br /> Ms. Richards said that the proposed parking garage qualifies as an MPO <br />intersection project and the MPO has voted to write to DEQ urging them to withhold <br />recommending a pproval until a new traffic study has been completed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch noted that Council agenda information is now available on the City's <br />website. <br /> <br />PRESENTATION <br />: REGION TEN COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD <br /> <br /> Mr. John Trippel, Region Ten Board member, gave a brief re port on activities of <br />the Region Ten Community Services Board over the past year. He said that a new <br />Clubhouse has been built on Elliewood Avenue; operations continue at the Meadowcreek <br />Center; nine staff members have been cut at the Fourth Street Station and Mohr Center <br />due to State budget cuts. He said that the Mohr Center now has public diversion beds , <br />but no more walk in beds. <br /> <br />REPORT <br />: TRAFFIC STUDY FOR PROPOSED GARAGE AT UNIVERSITY OF <br />VIRGINIA <br /> <br /> Mr. O'Connell explained that the City employed an in dependent firm to review <br />the traffic study commissioned by the University in conjunction with their proposed <br />parking garage. <br /> <br /> Mr. Jim Tolbert, Director of Neighborhood Development Services, explained that <br />the City's traffic consultant reviewed the finding s of the Glatting Jackson traffic study <br />which had been commissioned by the University, but found that there are fundamental <br />errors in the methodology and assumptions used by Glatting Jackson, and, as a result, the <br />City has little confidence in the traffic study and does not believe that it can be used to <br />base decisions upon. Mr. Tolbert said staff feel that a more detailed traffic study needs to <br />be conducted and there needs to be a synchronization plan funded by the University. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.