My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-04-21
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2003
>
2003-04-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2004 10:10:19 AM
Creation date
10/12/2004 5:41:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
4/21/2003
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br />said that new development may come before this project gets done, and asked if there is a <br />mechanism to expedite the project. <br /> <br /> Mr. Rue said the cost figures may be different and th e next phase of the study will <br />explore that further. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch asked which intersections the next phase of the study will target, and <br />Mr. Rue said it will include the Rt. 29/Hyraulic/250 Bypass intersections plus others, <br />including Barracks Road. He said how it is expanded still needs to be defined. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch said that the Rt. 29/250 Bypass and Hydraulic/250 Bypass <br />intersections do not feel as developed as the Rt. 29/Hydraulic intersection in the study, <br />and he said he wants to make sure they get the sam e analysis. <br /> <br /> Mr. Cox said he would also like to see a full integration of transit in the study to <br />lessen the need for road improvements. <br /> <br /> Mr. Caravati requested that the resolution not be considered at this time as he has <br />a number of questions and would like to see the final document before taking action. Mr. <br />Caravati said this is very important to the City. <br /> <br /> Mr. Schilling made a motion to postpone the resolution until the final report is <br />received. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch seconded the motion, and said that a lot st ill needs to be worked out in <br />the document. He said he fully supports the entire corridor study, but feels there is a <br />middle ground between the targeted next phase and the entire corridor. Mr. Lynch said <br />Rio Road is also very important. <br /> <br /> Mr. Cox said he opposes delaying the resolution and feels Council needs to get <br />behind a plan soon. <br /> <br /> The resolution endorsing the Rt. 29/Hydraulic/250 Bypass Intersections Study <br />was deferred to the next meeting by the following vote. Ayes: Mr. Caravati, Mr. Lynch, <br />Mr. Schilling. Noes: Mr. Cox and Ms. Richards. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING/RESOLUTION <br />: LEASE OF WATER STREET PROPERTY TO <br />H & R BLOCK <br /> <br /> Mr. Craig Brown, City Attorney, explained that H & R Block has been a tenant of <br />the property since the City acquired the property in 1998, and is proposed to pay $38,280 <br />annually for three years. Mr. Brown said that the lease allows the City to terminate the <br />lease on 90 days notice except during tax season. <br /> The public hearing was opened. <br /> <br /> Ms. Susan Furth, Manager at H & R Block, said that this location serves 2,500 <br />clients, and she hopes Council will continue the lease. <br /> <br /> As there were no further speakers, the public hearing was closed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Caravati made a motion to approve the lease, and Ms. Richards seconded the <br />motion. <br /> <br /> Respondi ng to a question from Mr. Schilling, Mr. Brown said that the lease has <br />changed to include the corrected square footage and to clarify the delivery notice <br />regarding termination of the lease. <br /> <br /> The resolution Approving the Lease of Property to H & R Block wa s approved by <br />the following vote. Ayes: Mr. Caravati, Mr. Cox, Mr. Lynch, Ms. Richards, Mr. <br />Schilling. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.