My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-11-15
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2004
>
2004-11-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2005 2:31:48 PM
Creation date
8/24/2005 2:22:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
11/15/2004
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11 <br /> <br />separation of church and state. She said she has issues with a bill that singles out a class <br />of people for discrimination. She said she would never advocate to regulate how <br />churches conduct their business and feels that would be wrong, but feels it is also not <br />proper to make government follow a particular religious path. She said she will support <br />the resolution and has not received a flood of negative calls. She said that while surveys <br />show that people support a ban on gas marriage, surveys also show that two thirds of <br />people support civil unions. She said supporting the resolution is standing up for fairness <br />and is the right thing to do. <br /> <br /> Dr. Brown said that Ms. Hamilton summed up how he feels. He said he thinks <br />Council should be careful in passing resolutions on national and state issues and that <br />when they do it should be on issues that affect people locally. He said this passes that <br />test. He said he hopes we can get something started statewide. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch said he feels the statute is mean spirited. He said he has no issue with <br />what people believe in their own faith, but when they impose their religious beliefs on <br />others in a punitive way he feels they cross the line. <br /> <br /> Mr. Schilling thanked Ms. Hamilton for her sincere remarks and asked that his <br />comments be entered verbatim in the minutes. "I'd like to thank members of the public <br />who have expressed opinions on this subject. I have heard and appreciate your <br />comments. In the interest of focusing valuable City Council time on items over which this <br />Council maintains jurisdiction, I will make my comments extremely brief: I'm concerned <br />that through actions such as the one we are undertaking at this moment, that this Council <br />overestimates its own importance, and in doing so undermines its own credibifity. I urge <br />people interested in this issue to contact their State and Federal representatives <br />directly." <br /> <br /> The Resolution Supporting a Repeal of the Ban on Same Sex Civil Unions was <br />approved by the following vote. Ayes: Dr. Brown, Mr. Caravati, Ms. Hamilton, Mr. <br />Lynch. Noes: Mr. Schilling. <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the General Assembly passed House Bill 751 in the 2004 legislative <br />session; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, HB 751 prohibits civil unions, "partnership contract(s) or other <br />arrangement(s) between persons of the same sex purporting to bestow the privileges or <br />obligations of marriage"; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the bill also voids such unions, partnership contracts or <br />arrangements made in other states by persons now living in Virginia; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, Governor Mark Warner offered amendments striking references to <br />"partnership contracts or other arrangement(s)" in order to protect the rights and interests <br />of Virginians; and <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the House of Delegates rejected these amendments on a 35-65 vote; <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, HB 751 became law on July 1, 2004 as Virginia Code § 20-45.3; <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, this law violates the basic civil and constitutional rights of citizens <br />of the Commonwealth; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, Va. Code §20-45.3 could invalidate many types of contracts that <br />gay, lesbian and straight partners have used in Virginia to construct legal arrangements <br />such as power of attorney, joint custody arrangements and medical directives; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, invalidation of such contracts and arrangements might also cause <br />loss of domestic partner health insurance and other employee benefits provided by <br />Virginia employers, as well as jeopardize joint business partnerships, mutual wills and <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.