Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Caravati said he thinks that is a capital idea and he made a motion to approve <br />the programming resolution and the resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign the <br />agreement with VDOT. <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch seconded the motion <br /> <br />Mr. Caravati called the question on the second reading of the appropriation. <br /> <br />It was agreed that discussion would be held prior to the vote. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch said he thinks it is a good idea to separate the two issues. He said he is <br />not opposed to a discussion on regional road commitments. He said there is newly <br />available matching VDOT money. He said the City and County could match each other, <br />then go to VDOT for funding for a location study for the eastern connector and southern <br />parkway. He said we need to be clear that our support is for a two lane road, an <br />interchange that works, replacement parkland, and a commitment from the County and <br />VDOT on a regional network. He said he thinks we should have agreement on these <br />before we begin construction. He said he believes an interchange can be done for under <br />$15 million. He said we should not allow past lack of funding to be an excuse. He said <br />he thinks we can ask for more funding. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tolbert clarified that the City/State agreement carries through to construction <br />of the interchange. <br /> <br /> Mr. Caravati withdrew his previous motion and made a motion to approve the <br />resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign the agreement with VDOT for the City to <br />manage the project. <br /> <br /> Ms. Hamilton seconded the motion and it was approved by the following vote. <br />Ayes: Dr. Brown, Mr. Caravati, Ms. Hamilton, Mr. Lynch, Mr. Schilling. Noes: None. <br /> <br /> On motion by Mr. Caravati, seconded by Ms. Hamilton, Council approved the <br />Meadowcreek Parkway interchange programming resolution by the following vote. Ayes: <br />Dr. Brown, Mr. Caravati, Ms. Hamilton, Mr. Lynch, Mr. Schilling. Noes: None. <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, in accordance with Virginia Department of Transportation <br />construction allocation procedures, it is necessary that a request by council resolution be <br />made in order that the Department approve an urban highway project in the City of <br />Charlottesville; now, therefore <br /> <br /> BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Charlottesville, Virginia <br />requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to award an urban system highway <br />project for the Route 250 Bypass Interchange (Project Number 250-104-103, PE101, <br />RW201, C501, B604, UPC 60234). <br /> <br /> BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Charlottesville <br />hereby agrees to pay its share of the total cost for preliminary engineering, right of way <br />and construction of this project in accordance with Section 33.1-44 of the Code of <br />Virginia, and that, if the City of Charlottesville subsequently elects to cancel this project, <br />the City of Charlottesville hereby agrees to reimburse the Virginia Department of <br />Transportation for the total amount of the costs expended by the Department through the <br />date the Department is notified of such cancellation. <br /> <br /> The $1.5 million of State funds for the Meadowcreek Parkway interchange design <br />study, which was offered at the March 7th meeting, was approved by the following vote. <br />Ayes: Dr. Brown, Mr. Caravati, Ms. Hamilton, Mr. Lynch, Mr. Schilling. Noes: None. <br /> <br /> BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Charlottesville, Virginia that <br />the sum of $1,551,000.00, to be received from the Commonwealth of Virginia (VDOT), <br />is hereby appropriated to account code 26-280-051692, for design engineering services <br />related to the proposed Meadowcreek Parkway Project. The total cost of said engineering <br /> <br /> <br />