My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-04-18
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2005
>
2005-04-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2005 3:07:27 PM
Creation date
8/24/2005 2:48:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
4/18/2005
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
include these projects. <br /> <br /> Responding to a comment by Jennifer Whitaker of RWSA, Mr. Wagner said he is <br />confident that our current local supply plan will suffice. <br /> <br />Mr. Rooker asked if 404 analysis requires analysis of alternatives. <br /> <br />Mr. Schwin said yes, the Corps has to select the least damaging alternative. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch asked what is the minimum review time ifRWSA has already <br />reviewed alternatives and feels our selected alternative is the least environmentally <br />damaging. <br /> <br /> Mr. Schwin said the Corps has to do its own independent review. He said there is <br />a 120 day review window unless an environmental assessment is needed. <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch asked about the level of construction plans needed before approval. <br /> <br /> Mr. Schwin said alternatives will be evaluated on the basis of the impact on <br />wetlands and streams. <br /> <br /> A representative of DEQ said that in reviewing the concepts so far, raising the <br />Ragged Mountain dam to 13 feet will have less impact than a higher dam. He said the <br />question is what next as raising the dam to 13 feet will only go but so far. <br /> <br /> An agency representative said they would look at raising the dam but would want <br />to know what other alternatives there are for getting more water and their environmental <br />impacts. <br /> <br /> Ms. Sally Thomas, member of the Board of Supervisors, said the decision <br />regarding raising the dam 13 feet versus higher will take longer than July. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch asked what it will take to get a community water supply plan <br />approved. He said the community started on the process in 1999 and in 2002 a set of <br />recommendations were approved as well as a rate hike to pay for them. He said this plan <br />involved raising the South Fork Rivanna dam by four feet, repairing the Ragged <br />Mountain dam, rebuilding Mechum's River dam, and maintenance dredging. He said the <br />consultant overestimated the amount of water that could be stored by a four foot bladder. <br />He said if we raise the Ragged Mountain dam to 13 feet it should be adequate. <br /> <br /> Mr. Stokely said he does not want a piecemeal process. He said it is cleaner to <br />apply for the overall process which includes an environmental study, then apply for the <br />13 feet dam. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch said he understood there were issues about dredging and asked if we <br />can do the pumping station. <br /> <br /> Mr. Randy Parker, Chairman of the Albemarle County Service Authority said he <br />thought that plan was abandoned. <br /> <br /> Mr. Schwin said that only the least damaging alternative is taken into account <br />(including cost, technology and logistics). He said the alternative has to be practicable <br />for the applicant. He said the Corps is obligated to only permit for the least damaging <br />alternative even if it is not the applicant's preferred alternative. <br /> <br /> Mr. Stokely said that the alternative that is last damaging to wetlands and steams <br />is the most important. <br /> <br />Mr. Schwin noted that the EPA has veto authority over the Corps. <br /> <br /> Mr. Wagner said we are not locked into developing a 50 year plan, and can use a <br />30 year time period. Mr. Wagner said it seems that the 2002 plan referred to by Mr. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.