Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Aubrey Watts, CFO, reviewed the proposed water rate increases: water - <br />overall increase of 9%; sewer - 6.4% increase; gas .025% increase plus other fee <br />increases intended to cover direct cost of services. <br /> <br />The public hearing was opened. <br /> <br /> Mr. Kenneth Jackson, 1437 Rugby Avenue, said he understands inflation costs, <br />but thinks utility prices are high and suggested that money be pulled from other places to <br />reduce the cost. He said the increases do not take low income people into consideration. <br /> <br />As there were no further speakers, the public hearing was closed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Caravati asked if gas is cut off due to non-payment are funds available for <br />assistance, and Mr. Watts said that an application can be made for assistance and if there <br />is a legitimate need assistance will be given. <br /> <br /> Responding to a question from Mr. Schilling, Ms. Judy Mueller, Director of <br />Public Works, said that the water conservation position has been vacant most of this <br />fiscal year. <br /> <br /> Mr. Schilling said that Council is being asked to spend $143,000 for water <br />conservation, but there is no amount targeted for savings. He asked where this amount <br />came from. He said he cannot support this if we got by for a year with no one in the <br />position. He suggested keeping the position vacant and putting the bulk of the funds into <br />stopping leaks. He said we are taking over $1 million out of the gas utility to pay for <br />CityLink and the gas utility does not use that much IT services. He said this is evidence <br />that the gas utility operates on a for-profit, not non-profit basis. Regarding gas, he said <br />we are asking people to conserve by spending $50,000 and also spending money to <br />promote the use of gas. He said the answer he has received to this is that we want and <br />need new customers and we then encourage people to conserve. He said he is not sure <br />that is a good answer. He said there is a line item for the City Yard and he is not sure he <br />can support this without a good understanding of what it is for. He said the University's <br />water rate increase is less than that for citizens and he does not think the public has heard <br />a good explanation of why that is. He made a plead for Council to remove the <br />summer/winter rates as he said it is subsidizing students who are not here in the summer. <br />He said this is an idea that does not work in this community. <br /> <br />Mr. Caravati noted that the funding for CityLink was in the form of a loan. <br /> <br /> Mr. O'Connell said that Council approved the loan from the utilities on February <br />2, 2004, with the understanding that it will be paid back. He said the money is also used <br />for other technology. He said another way to have funded CityLink was in the capital <br />fund paid by taxpayers, and not to be paid back. He said the financing was done as a <br />business plan. He said money was set aside for technology starting four years ago. <br /> <br /> Mr. Caravati asked how long we have talked about moving City Yard, and Ms. <br />Mueller said since 1986 when land was purchased on Avon Street. She noted that gas is <br />the primary polluter of the City Yard site. <br /> <br /> Responding to a question from Mr. Caravati about whether there is money enough <br />to clean up City Yard, Ms. Mueller said there is not enough money to remediate the site. <br />She noted that federal grant money will be used to build the transit operations center on <br />Avon Street. <br /> <br /> Mr. Caravati asked if remediation of City Yard is something we are going to have <br />to do, and Ms. Mueller said yes, if we want to sell the land. She said the level of <br />remediation will be dictated by the future use. <br /> <br />Mr. Schilling noted that he did not support moving City Yard. <br /> <br /> Mr. Caravati made a motion to approve the utility rate ordinance and Mr. Lynch <br />seconded the motion. <br /> <br /> <br />