|
4
<br />WAS ADVISED THAT THE CITY WAS NOT INTERESTED IN JUST FIVE FEET (5'), BUT
<br />WAS INTERESTED IN A TEN FOOT (10~) STRIP OF THE LANIER PROPERTY. ON
<br />MOTION 8Y MR. FORGES, SECONDED BY MR. TEBELL, THIS MATTER WAS CONTINUED
<br />AND MR, COPENHAVER WAS REQUESTED TO RETURN AT A LATER DATE WITH THE BEST
<br />POSSIBLE OFFER FOR A TEN FOOT (10~) STRIP.
<br />A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE V, F, W, APPEARED BEFORE THE COUNCIL AND
<br />REQUEST RE: DUFF PROPERTY
<br />BY V, F, W, REQUESTED PERMISSION TO REMAIN IN THE DUFF PROPERTY ON SECOND STREET, S, W.
<br />UNTIL DECEMBER 1, 1953, AT WHICH TIME THEIR NEW HOME WOULD BE READY, ON
<br />MOTION BY MR. ~AVIS, SECONDED BY MR. WEINBERG, THIS REQUEST WAS UNANIMOUSLY
<br />GRANTED.
<br />BY HIM. AFTER CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION, A MOTION BY MR. WEINBERG, SECONDED BY
<br />h1R, DAVIS, THAT THE CHANGES REQUESTED AND AS SHOWN ON MAPS PRESENTED BE
<br />GRANTED, PROVIDED, SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS COULD BE WORKED OUT WITH THE
<br />CHIEF OF POLICE FOR NEW TURNAROUND PLACES.
<br />ON MOTION BY MR, ~AVIS, SECONDED BY MR. TEBELL, A COUNTY WATER APPLICATION
<br />MR. B, A, RENNOLDS, REPRESENTING THE C & A BUS COIaPANY ADDRESSED THE
<br />COUNCIL AND REQUESTED PERMISSION FOR HIS COMPANY TO CURTAIL AND CHANGE
<br />REQUEST RE: CHANGES IN
<br />BUS SERVICE ~ C & A BUS CO. SOME OF THE BUS SERVICE IN THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH DETAIL PLANS SUBMITTED
<br />COUNTY WATER APPLICATION
<br />WAS APPROVED FOR:
<br />DESMOND R, H, GOURLEY BELLAIR
<br />A PETITION FROPA THE RESIDENTS OF PAGE STREET RELATIVE TO SCHENK~S BRANCH
<br />AT THE REAR OF THEIR PROPERTIES WAS PRESENTED. THE CITY MANAGER ADVISED THAT
<br />PETITION PRESENTED RE:
<br />SCHENK~S BRANCH A SIMILAR PETITION HAD BEEN PRESENTED APPROXIMATELY ONE YEAR AGO, AND THE
<br /> COMMITTEE AT THAT TIME HAD FOUND THAT THE CITY WAS NOT OBLIGATED IN ANY WAY
<br />SINCE THE BRANCH WAS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE MATTER BE
<br />REFERRED TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT FOR THEIR INVESTIGATION AND REPORT ON THE
<br />SANITATION PROBLEM. ON MOTION BY MR, WEINBERG, SECONDED BY MR. FORGES, THE
<br />FOREGOING RECOMMENDATION WAS APPROVED.
<br />ON MOTION BY MR, FORGES, SECONDED BY MR. DAVIS, THE FOLLOWING REPORT WAS
<br />UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED:
<br />SEPTEMBER 21, 1953
<br />" RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
<br />STREET COMMITTEE
<br />S _~~_~g4E3_~~1~N~Q1
<br />s!l.L9_B n1~1`1_5.~..I.Sa~~L__
<br />ON MOTION BY MR. ~ORBES, SECONDED BY MR. DAVIS, THE FOLLOWING REPORT
<br />WAS UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED:
<br />SEPTEMBER 21, 1953
<br />TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL
<br />CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA
<br />GENTLEMEN:
<br />REPORT RE:
<br />SPOTTSWOOD ROAD YOUR COMMITTEE HAS INVESTIGATED THE PETITIONS RELATIVE
<br />TO SPOTTSWOOD ROAD AND RECOMPAEND AS FOLLOWS:
<br />THAT IF THE PROPERTY OWNER WILL DEDICATE FOR STREET
<br />PURPOSES THE LAND AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED PLAT, THE STREET
<br />BE WIDENED ON THIS CURVE AND THAT THE REIdAINDER OF THE STREET
<br />BE REPAIRED BY FILLING UP THE DITCH AND SURFACE TREATING THE
<br />LOWER END OF THE STREET.
<br />REPORT RE:
<br />CARLTON ROAD TO THE MEMBERS OF THE LOUNCI-L
<br />CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA
<br />GENTLEMEN:
<br />WE HAVE INVESTIGATED THE PETITION TO WIDEN EARL TON ROAD
<br />
|