|
~o
<br />COUtJC IL ~,;HAMBER - DECEi`1BER 6, 1954
<br />THE COUNCIL MET IN REGULAR SESSION ON THIS DATE WITH THE FOI_,LOWING
<br />MEMBERS PRESENT: MR, DAVIS, I'~R, FORBES, MR. HILL, MR. MICHIE AND MR,
<br />WEINBERG. ABSENT: NONE.
<br />THE MINUTES OF THF MEETINGS OF tJOVEMBER 15, 1954 AND tVOVEMBER ia,
<br />1954 WERE READ AND APPROVED.
<br />MR. GEORGE COLES ADDRESSED THE COUNCIL ON BEHALF OF PAUL C. SMITH
<br />AND W I FE, .10HN E. EARLY, +~R, AND W 1 FE AND t'I. ~ . PR 1 CF AND W 1 FE, AND
<br />MATTER RE; WATER LINE REQUESTED THE CITY TO ABANDON THE PRESENT WATER LINE ACROSS LOT C ON
<br />RuGeY RD, EXTD.
<br />RUGBY ROAD EXTENDED WITH THE pR0`JISION THAT A NEW LINE COULD [;F LAID IN
<br />A DIFFERENT LOCATION ON THE LOT. nN MOTION BY MR. HILL, SECONDED BY
<br />I'•1R, DAVIS, THE h~AYOR WAS AUTHORIZED TO EXF_CUTE AN AGREEMENT FOR THIS
<br />CHANGE.
<br />I'M1R. W. T, STEVENS ADDRESSED THE COUNCIL AND REQUESTED THAT WOODROW
<br />STREET BF. OPENED TO STADIUM ~~OAD AND THF. ENTIRE STREET BE PAVED. MR.
<br />I`IATTER RE: ~t+/OODROW STEVENS WAS ADVISF_D THAT THE CITY DOES NOT CONSTRi1CT RESIDENTIAL STREF_TS
<br />STREET
<br />AT THE CITY~S EXPENSE, BUT THAT AN ESTIMATE OF THE COST OF THIS wORK
<br />WOUI_U BE FURNISHED SO THAT THf: PROPERTY OWNERS ON THAT STREET COULD
<br />DETERMINE IF THEY WISHEp TO HAVE THE WORK DONE.
<br />MR.
<br />THAT THE
<br />REQUEST TU CLOSE
<br />REMAINING PORTION t'IR. INCH
<br />OF WILLOW DRIVE
<br />PL ANPJ 1 NG
<br />MR.
<br />.). EARL BARNETT PRESENTED A PETITION TO THF= C~:!UNCI L REQUESTING
<br />REMAINING PORTION OF ~~ILLOW DRIVE BE. C!_OSED. CN MOTION BY
<br />IE, SECONDED BY MR, DAVIS, THIS REQUEST WAS RE FEP.RED TO THE
<br />LOMtd1~SION FOR STUDY ANO RECOMMENDATION.
<br />,.TAMES H. ~''~ICHAEI_S, .~R. AbDRE55ED THE COUNCIL ON BEHALF OF
<br />MR. WiLL1AMSON W. FULLER, AND REQUESTED THE EXTENSION OF A WATER t_INE
<br />REQUEST FOR WATER TO SERVE A PROPOSED RESTAURANT AND MOTEL ON t'10NTICELLO MOUNTAIN, MR,
<br />EXTENSION - h10NTICELLO MT.
<br />MICHAELS WAS ADVISED THAT THE WATER LIMES IN THAT VICINITY WERE NOT
<br />LARGE ENOUGH TO WARRANT SUCH AN EXTENSION, BUT THAT A STUDY WOULD BE
<br />MADE. TO DETERMINE THE POSSIBILITIES OF GETTING WATER TO THE AREA.
<br />O,N MOTION BY hiR. DAVIS, SECONDED BY P'1R, HILL, THF ALTRU$A CLUB OF
<br />A{_TRUSA CLUB - NON-PROF I T ~'HARI.O"fTES`J I LL_F, WAS DEC.I_AREO A NON-PROF I T ORGANIZATION UNDER SECT 1 ON 85(n)
<br />ORGAPJ IZAT ION
<br />Of THF t..iCENSE TAX nRDINANCE.
<br />Q COh1IdUNICATION WAS RECEIVED FROM BARBARA W. ROSSER OFFERING TO SELL
<br />I''~ATTER RE: OFFF_R LAND TO THF LITY FOR STREET PURPOSES, A STRIP OF LAND ON FIELD GOAD AND
<br />FOR SALE FOR STREET PURPOSES
<br />FIELD Bi WFSTVIEW F`DS. WESTVIEW ROAD. THF STREET COMMITTEE RECD--MMENDED THAT SINCE THE CITY DOES
<br />NOT DEVEt_OP RESIOENTIAI STREETS, THIS OFFER BE DECLiNE.D. UN MOTION BY
<br />I'4R. D4V15, SECONDED BY MR. HILL, THE FOREGOING RECOMMENDATION WAS
<br />UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
<br />ON MOTION BY hiR, FORBESi SECONDED BY I''iR. DAVIS, THE FOLLOWING CLAIM
<br />AGAINST THE DOG FUND WAS APPROVED FOR PAYMENT:
<br />CL_ A I M AGAINST
<br />DOG FUND MRS, NET"ilE HALL $1.6u
<br />~)N MOTION BV MR, H IL1_, SECONDED BY ~'~R, DAVIS, THE FOl_L.OW I NG REPORT
<br />WAS UNA^1 1 MO1J51_Y ADOPTED:
<br />DECEMBER 2,.1954
<br />TO THE MEIdBERS OF THE COUNCIL
<br />rITY OF CHARLOTTESVll1.F, VIRGINIA
<br />
<br />GENTI_FMEN:
<br />YOUR STREET COMMITTEE H,AS STUDIED THE MATTER OF SIpEWALKS AT THE
<br />
|