Laserfiche WebLink
220 <br />MR. GARY CLARK ADDRESSED THE COUNCIL WITH REFERENCE TO THE STREETS <br />IN HIS PROPERTY JUST OFF MAURY AVENUE KNOWN AS CLARK COURT. AFTER CON- <br />MATTER RE: SIDERABLE DISCUSSION, THE MAYOR INFORMED MR. CLARK THAT HIS PLAT OF THE <br />CLARK COURT <br />SUBDIVISfON WOULD HAVE TO BE APPROYEO 8Y THE PLANNING COMMISSION BEFORE <br />THE CITY COULD CONSIDER ACCEPTING THE STREETS INTO THE CITY STREET SYSTEM <br />FOR MAINTENANCE SINCE THE PLAT HE NOW PROPOSED WAS DIFFERENT FROM THE <br />ORIGINAL PLAT. <br />A COMMUNICATION WAS RECEIVED FROM VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY <br />REQUESTING PERMISSION TO EXTEND AN AERIAL CABLE ACROSS MAIN STREET. ON <br />MATTER RE: AERIAL MOTION BY MR. MICHIE, SECONDED BY MR. HILL, ACTION ON THIS REQUEST WAS DE- <br />CABLE ACROSS MAIN ST. <br />PERKED UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING. <br />THE PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CHARLOTTESVILLE-ALBEMARLE <br />COUNTY AIRPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1957 WAS PRESENTED <br />AIRPORT BUDGET SHOWING ESTIMATED INCOME OF $1,200.00 ANO PROPOSED EXPENDITURES OF $1,200.00. <br />A MOTION BY MR. WEINBERG, SECONDED BY MR. MICHIE, THAT THIS BUDGET BE APPROVED <br />SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WAS UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED. <br />AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE FOR IMPOSING AND COLLECTING LICENSES <br />AND TAXES FOR THE EXERCISE OF CERTAIN PRIVILEGES WITHIN THE CITY ~ CHARLOTTES- <br />LICENSE Tax ORDINANCE VILLE FOR TWELVE MONTHS COMMENCING ON THE FIRST DAY OF MAY, 1957, AND ENDING <br />CARRIED OVER <br />THE THIRTaETH DAY OF APRIL, 1958" WAS OFFERED BY MR. MICHIE, SECONDED BY <br />MR. COLEMAN, AND CARRIED OVER TO THE NEXT MEETING FOR CONSIDERATION. <br />THE COMMITTEE APPOINTED TO CONSIDER WHAT ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN REGARDING <br />REPORT OF MILK THE STATE MILK COMMISSION RULING RECOMMENDED THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY BE INSTRUCTED <br />COMMITTEE <br />TO COOPERATE WITH ANY LOCAL GROUP WHO MIGHT APPEAL THE DECISION OF THE MILK <br />COMMISSION AND THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY REQUEST PERMISSION OF THE COURT TO FILE <br />A BRIEF "AMICUS CURIAE" IN THE EVENT OF AN APPEAL. ON MOTION BY MR. MICHIE, <br />SECONDED BY MR. WEINBERG, THE FOREGOING RECOMMENDATION WAS UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED. <br />ON MOTION BY MR. MICHIE, SECONDED BY MR. COLEMAN, THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION <br />WAS UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED: <br />THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE: <br />HAVING ATTENDED THE PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON FEBRUARY 21, 1957 BY THE <br />STATE MILK COMMISSION ON THE APPLICATION OF THE ALBEMARLE DAIRYMEN~S <br />ASSOCIATION REQUESTING THE COMMISSION TO EXERCISE ITS POWER TO FIX MAXIMUM <br />AND MINIMUM PRICES FOR MILK IN TWE CHARLOTTESVILLE MARKET, <br />RESOLUTION RE: HAVING NOTED AT SUCH HEARING THAT THE PROPONENTS OF THE EXERCISE OF <br />STATE MILK COMMISSION <br />SUCH AUTHORITY IN THEIR TESTIMONY AND STATEMENTS DID NOT PRESENT ANY FACTS <br />INDICATING ANY ADVERSE CHANGE IN THE CONDITION OF THE MILK INDUSTRY IN THIS <br />MARKET OVER THOSE EXISTING SINCE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE COMMISSION IN 1934, <br />DURING ALL OF WHICH TIME THE CHARLOTTESVILLE MARKET HA5 BEEN FREE FROM. THE <br />CONTROL OF THE COMMISSION, <br />HAVING THEREFORE COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT IT WOULD NOT BE IN THE <br />PUBLIC INTEREST FOR THE COMMISSION TO EXERCISE ITS POWERS OF PRICE FIXING IN <br />THE CHARLOTTESVILLE MARKET AND HAVING ADOPTED A RESOLUTION TO THAT EFFECT <br />AND SENT A COPY TO THE COMMISSION AND, <br />HAVING SUBSEQUENTLY LEARNED THAT 7HE COMMISSION HAD DETERMINED TO <br />EXERCISE ITS POWER TO FIX MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM PRICES FOR MILK IN THE <br />CHARLOTTESVILLE AREA AND, <br />BEING STRONGLY OF THE OPINION THAT SUCH DECISION OF THE COMMISSION <br />WAS NOT JUSTIFIED BY THE EVIDENCE PRODUCED BEFORE IT, <br />