Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 32 <br /> Ms. Beauregard reviewed bills being considered by the General Assembly which <br />could affect the City’s budget. She said the State says that the telecommunications bill <br />will be revenue neutral, but said we do not know if that will be the case. She said caps of <br />3% and 5% on real estate tax increases are being considered. She noted that a cap of 5% <br />would amount to eleven cents on the City’s tax rate. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch said that if the State fails to reimburse localities for personal property <br />taxes, the cost will have to be passed on to car owners and the percentage would need to <br />be changed. <br /> <br /> Responding to a question from Mr. Lynch, Ms. Beauregard said that $10.015 <br />million in County revenue sharing funding is expected this year. <br /> <br />Ms. Beauregard said the City is doing well on interest earned. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Dr. Brown, Ms. Beauregard said that meals tax <br />revenue is expected to increase 2% and lodging tax is expected to increase 5%. <br /> <br />Mr. O’Connell said that the budget is based on the Governor’s budget and is <br />subject to General Assembly changes. He said the School are concerned about the State <br />budget. <br /> <br />It was agreed that a community budget forum will be held at Buford cafeteria on a <br />Saturday after the budget is presented. <br /> <br />Mr. O’Connell said that financial data will be on the website as well as updated <br />budget history. <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch said he thinks it would be a good idea to have a work session on <br />retirement and health benefits and that it should involve a wider community discussion. <br /> <br />Dr. Brown said he does not think Council should try to do this as part of the <br />budget. <br /> <br />Mr. Caravati said that long range planning is necessary regarding benefits, and <br />this is not something we can react to in one year. He said reductions to the subsidy to <br />employee spouses is being considered, but beyond that there needs to be a long term <br />discussion and phasing in of changes. Mr. Caravati said that in looking at revenue <br />projections, he thinks that if Councilors are thinking about cutting revenues, he asked that <br />they suggest things to cut rather than just reducing the tax by a percentage. He said <br />revenues and expenditures should be done at the same time and should involve Council, <br />staff and the community. <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch said we should start with expense drivers. <br /> <br />Dr. Brown said he thinks Mr. Caravati makes a good point. <br /> <br />Mr. Schilling noted that there had been no Council policy last year about cutting <br />taxes and it happened all by itself. He encouraged the City Manager to do that again this <br />year. <br /> <br />Mr. Schilling asked if it is correct that the City has added 61 ½ positions in the <br />last six year. <br /> <br />Mr. Beauregard said these are full time equivalents. <br /> <br />Mr. O’Connell reviewed the staffing changes. <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch said two major cost centers are employee costs and the cost of poverty. <br /> <br />The meeting was adjourned. <br /> <br /> <br />