My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-02-06
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2006
>
2006-02-06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2007 9:59:01 AM
Creation date
7/25/2007 9:39:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
2/6/2006
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING <br /> <br />A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY COUNCIL WILL BE <br />HELD ON Monday, February 6, 2006 AT 5:45 p.m. IN THE Second Floor Conference <br />Room. <br /> <br />THE PROPOSED AGENDA IS AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br /> Closed session as provided by Section 2.2-3712 of the Virginia Code <br /> <br />BY ORDER OF THE MAYOR BY Jeanne Cox <br /> <br />SECOND FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM – February 6, 2006 <br /> <br /> Council met in special session on this date with the following members present: <br />Dr. Brown, Mr. Caravati, Ms. Hamilton, Mr. Schilling. Absent: Mr. Lynch. <br /> <br /> On motion by Mr. Caravati, seconded by Mr. Schilling, Council voted (Ayes: Dr. <br />Brown, Mr. Caravati, Ms. Hamilton, Mr. Schilling. Noes: None. Absent: Mr. Lynch) to <br />meet in closed session for interviews of candidates for appointment to the Board of <br />Architectural Review, and discussion and consideration of candidates for appointment to <br />City boards and commissions, as authorized by Section 2.2-3711(A)(1) of the Virginia <br />Code; for discussion or consideration of the disposition of publicly held real property on <br />Valley Road, where discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the negotiating <br />strategy of the City, as authorized by Section 2.2-3711(A)(3); and for consultation with <br />legal counsel regarding (i) the settlement of a disputed claim with the City’s natural gas <br />storage company; (ii) the available remedies for a breach of an existing City contract; and <br />(iii) two pending lawsuits, all as authorized by Section 2.2-3711(A)(7) of the Virginia <br />Code. <br /> <br /> On motion by Mr. Caravati, seconded by Mr. Schilling, Council certified by the <br />following vote (Ayes: Dr. Brown, Mr. Caravati, Ms. Hamilton, Mr. Schilling. Noes: <br />None. Absent: Mr. Lynch) that to the best of each Council Member's knowledge, only <br />public business matters lawfully exempted from the open meeting requirements of the <br />Virginia Freedom of Information Act and identified in the motion convening the closed <br />session were heard, discussed or considered in the closed session. <br /> <br />COUNCIL CHAMBER – February 6, 2006 <br /> <br /> Council met in regular session on this date with the following members present: <br />Dr. Brown, Mr. Caravati, Ms. Hamilton, Mr. Schilling. Absent: Mr. Lynch. <br /> <br />ANNOUNCEMENTS <br /> <br /> Dr. Brown made the following announcements: Council will hold a public <br />th <br />hearing on the downtown mall crossing on February 21; the condemnation of a lot on 5 <br />Street is off the agenda as the issue has been settled; and there is now a parking stamp for <br />Council meetings. <br /> <br /> Dr. Brown said he intends to bring up the following items during other business: <br />Meadowcreek Parkway Interchange Steering Committee membership and alternate <br />members and the natural gas storage settlement agreement. <br /> <br /> Mr. Caravati said he intends to bring up the Locust Avenue sidewalk during other <br />business. <br /> <br />PUBLIC <br /> <br /> Ms. Susanne Kogut, Executive Director of the SPCA, spoke regarding the <br />proposed animal ordinance. She said there are a number of bills pending in the General <br />Assembly and it may be best for Council to wait and see how those turns out. She said <br />the provision in the City’s proposed ordinance regarding dangerous dogs is overreaching. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.