My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-02-09
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2006
>
2006-02-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2007 9:59:09 AM
Creation date
7/25/2007 9:40:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
2/9/2006
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING <br /> <br />A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY COUNCIL WILL BE <br />HELD ON Thursday, February 9, 2006 AT 5:00 p.m. IN THE Basement Conference <br />Room. <br /> <br />THE PROPOSED AGENDA IS AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br /> Work Session: Parks and Recreation Future Facilities and Program Needs <br /> <br />BY ORDER OF THE MAYOR BY Jeanne Cox <br /> <br />BASEMENT CONFERENCE ROOM – February 9, 2006 <br /> <br />Council met in special session on this date with the following members present: <br />Dr. Brown, Mr. Caravati, Ms. Hamilton, Mr. Lynch, Mr. Schilling. <br /> <br />Mr. Maurice Jones, Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee, <br />introduced the topic for the work session. <br /> <br />Mr. Mike Svetz, Director of Parks and Recreation, reviewed the major findings of <br />the Facilities and Program Needs study. <br /> <br />Mr. Leon Younger, Pros Consulting, reviewed the Parks and Recreation Future <br />Facilities and Program Needs Assessment that was formally presented to Council on <br />December 5, 2005. The major findings included: the implementation of new programs <br />across the system is inconsistent; the earned income potential for programs and services <br />is highly undervalued; the establishment of core services is not well defined and facilities <br />do not match core program needs; all age segments are not equitably represented in <br />programs; and recreation facilities hours are well below industry standards for parks and <br />recreation systems. <br /> <br />Mr. Svetz said that a new Parks and Recreation Trail Planning position is <br />currently being advertised. <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch said he would like to address programming of existing facilities first. <br /> <br />Mr. Svetz said the Department is going through the process of restructuring <br />existing staff. <br /> <br />Mr. Younger listed the following facility development options: 1) Development <br />of a 100,000+ square foot multi-generational recreation center and outdoor aquatic park <br />as part of a single complex; 2) Expand Tonsler, Carver and Washington park Recreation <br />Centers to achieve a total of 50,000 square feet of additional space for wellness and <br />fitness along with gymnasium space and community program space for all ages and <br />people with disabilities and upgrade Smith, Meade and Crow Pools to modern design <br />standards to meet existing and future aquatic needs; and 3) Expand Tonsler, Carver and <br />Washington Park Centers to achieve a total of 50,000 square feet of additional space for 2 <br />wellness and fitness along with gymnasium space and community program space for all <br />ages and people with disabilities and development of one major indoor/outdoor aquatic <br />center and renovation of the bathhouse at Washington Park Pool. Mr. Younger said the <br />goal is to bring down the cost for each experience at a facility. <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch said that some of the programs identified as a high priority in the <br />survey are perceived as being provided by other groups. <br /> <br />Mr. Svetz said there is a need to better collaborate with those groups that provide <br />these programs. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Mr. Caravati, Mr. Younger said that Parks and <br />Recreation services are priced to the 20% who cannot pay except for adult and aquatic <br />programs. He said it is best to do a real cost of service and have the cost of recovery goal <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.