My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-03-29
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2006
>
2006-03-29
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2007 10:00:42 AM
Creation date
7/25/2007 9:50:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
3/29/2006
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
102 <br /> Responding to a question from Ms. Hamilton, Ms. Kelley said that the income <br />limit for the City is $73,300 for a household of three or more persons. <br /> <br /> Mr. Caravati said there were discussions when the Housing Strategy was adopted <br />about what low/moderate income is. <br /> <br /> Dr. Brown said the default position is to put aside one cent on the tax rate to begin <br />the program, and he asked if Councilors want to set aside this amount or more or less. <br /> <br /> Mr. Caravati said he would go in the middle. He said there are actually four <br />programs in the charter change. He said he thinks we would be lucky to meet the mid <br />November deadline for an ordinance for all four programs. He said he would only <br />support funding of $220,000 because it would likely only apply to half a year. <br /> <br /> Dr. Brown said the idea was to give the City a specific tool to help people who are <br />truly in danger of losing their homes. He said he favors starting off with the amount <br />proposed in the budget. He said after we get the administrative issues resolved, the <br />program could be expanded after one year. <br /> <br /> Ms. Hamilton said she also favors starting with the amount included in the <br />budget. <br /> <br /> Mr. O’Connell said this will affect the December tax bills so Council should make <br />a decision about criteria in May or June. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lee Richards, Commissioner of Revenue, said that applications would need <br />to be submitted by September. <br /> <br /> Mr. Schilling said he has a number of concerns about the program. He said that in <br />talking with people, he feels that the $50,000 overhead is too high and is troublesome. <br />He said there is also the issue of fairness since it would be first come first served. He <br />also expressed concern about the impact on rental property. He said there is also a tax <br />equity issue. He said there is also concern about personal tax information being on file <br />with the City. He said he does not think the program is ready and he cannot support it <br />this year. <br /> <br /> Ms. Hamilton asked about the rental property concern, and Mr. Schilling said <br />people in duplexes would not be able to participate. <br /> <br /> Mr. Caravati said that the City can also offer rental relief. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch said if the program was expanded, the four cents proposed for a tax <br />reduction could be put in this program which would amount to a 10 cent decrease this <br />year for those eligible. He said we should also ask the General Assembly for authority to <br />have a different tax rate for businesses and homeowners. <br /> <br /> Ms. Hamilton said she is interested in seeing the first year as a pilot with the <br />current amount budgeted. <br /> <br /> Mr. Caravati said he is persuaded to stay at the $420,000 level. He said he thinks <br />the administrative costs are reasonable. <br /> <br />Large Item Pickup <br /> <br />Regarding the large item pickup, Mr. Schilling said he brought up options at the <br />last meeting and is interested in hearing answers from staff to his questions, including <br />whether we could contract out the service at a savings and whether we could look at a <br />modified version of the neighborhood schedule that used to occur. He said he would like <br />to look at these options in order to bring down the cost. <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch said if we went back to the neighborhood schedule we should make <br />the service free, but if we keep it like it is he thinks we should keep the fee. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.