Laserfiche WebLink
30 <br /> ON MOTI•JN BY MR. DAVIS, SECONDED BY MR. MICHIE THE FOLLOWING CLAIM <br />CLAIM AGAINST <br />DOG FUND AGAINST THE DOG FUND WAS APPROVED FOR PAYMENT: <br /> KITTY ARCHER CLEGG 52.50 <br /> A COMMUNICATION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE COMMISSION ON PUBLIC EDUCATION <br /> ADVISING OF A PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 15TH AND INVITING THE COUNCIL TO <br /> ATTEND OR SEND A REPRESENTATIVE. THIS HEARING WILL BE DEVOTED TO THE <br />MATTER RE: PUBLIC HEARING <br />COMMISSION ON PUBLIC <br />QUESTION OF WHAT COURSE SHOULD VIRGINIA FOLLOW IN THE LIGHT OF THE <br />EDUCATION <br />DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT IN THE SCHOOL SEGREGATION CASES. ON MOTION <br /> BY MR. HILL, SECONDED BY MR. DAVIS, A JOINT MEETING WITH THE SCHOOL BOARD <br /> WAS SET FOR OCTOBER 25, 1954 AT 7:30 P. M. TO DISCUSS THIS MATTER. <br /> CN MOTION BY MR. HILL, SECONDED BY MR. DAVIS, THE BUDGETS FOR THE <br /> CITY-STATE OFFICES FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1955 WERE APPROVED AS PRESENTED. <br /> AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING CHAPTER 16 <br /> OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE OF 2945, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING <br />ORDINANCE ADOPTED RE: SECTION 1 OF CHAPTER 16, ENTITLED 'LIBF-iARY BOARD - ELECTION AND TERM OF <br />LIBRARY BOARD <br /> MEMBERS - VACANCIES " WAS OFFERED BY MR. HILL, SECONDED BY MR. DAVIS, AND <br />UPON THE RULES BEING SUSPENDED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE, WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING <br />RECORDED VOTE: AYES: MR. DAVIS, MR. FORBF_S, MR. HILL, MR. MICHIE AND MR. <br />WEINBERG. NOES: NONE. <br />THE FOLLOWING REPORT OF THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE WAS PRESENTED: <br />OCTOBER 18, 1954 <br />TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL <br />CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA <br />GENTLEMEN; <br />YOUR UTILITIES COMMITTEE, TOGETHER WITH THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE, HAVE <br />CAREFULLY STUDIED THE MATTER OF A SEWER TAX AND A NEW WATER RATE AND <br />RESPECTFULLY RECOMMEND AS FOLLOWS: <br />WE FEE1_ ANO SO RECOMMEND THAT A TAX SUFFICIENT TO COVER BOTH SEWER <br />PROJECTS BE LEVIED AT THIS TIME, THEREFORE, THE ATTACHED PROPOSED SEWER <br />TAX RATE, IF ADOPTED, WILi_ PRODUCE APPROXIMATELY 5130,000.00 IN REVENUE <br />AND iS A SUFFICIENT AMOUNT TO COVER THE INTEREST AND RETIREMENT ON BOTH <br />THE PRESENT SEWER PROJECT OF 51,200,000.00 FOR MEADOWCREEK PLANT AND LINES, <br />AND THE REMAINING PROJECT OF 5800,000.00 FOR THE i''IOORE~S CREEK PLANT AND LINES. <br />SOME SPECIAL HARDSHIP CASES MAY BE CAUSED BY THE ADOPTION OF THIS PROPOSED <br />SEWER TAX TO APPROXIMATELY TEN OF THE LARGER MANUFACTURING PLANTS iN THE CITY <br />WHO DO NOT DUMP A LARGE PORTION OF THEIR WATER INTO THE CITY SEWERS. WE HAVE <br />REFERENCE TO PLANTS WHICH USE A LARGE AMOUNT OF WATER FOR STEAM, HUMIDIFYING, <br />MANUFACTURING OF ICE, BOTTLING OF SOFT DRINKS, ETC. WE FEEL AND RECOMMEND <br />UTILITIES COMMITTEE THAT IF THES[ PLANTS HAVE AN AVERAGE MONTHLY CONSUMPTION OF WATER GREATER <br />REPORT RE: THAN 30,000 CU. FT. THAT SPECIAL C~~NStOERATION BE GIVEN TO THEM. WHEN <br />SEWER TAX AND NEW POSSIBLE, THEY SHOULD BF_ PERMITTED TO INSTALL, AT THEIR EXPENSE, A METER TO <br />WATER RATE RECORD EITHER THE WATER WHICH WILL, OR WILL NOT, ULTIMATELY REACH THE CITY <br />SEWERS. IF THIS IS NOT PRACTICABLE THEN WE SUGGEST THAT A SPECIAL COMMITTEE <br />DETERMINE IN EACH CASE THE APPROXIMATE PERCENTAGE OF WATER WHICH WILL OR WILL <br />NOT REACH THE CITY SEWERS AND TO ESTABLISH A FORMULA WHICH WILL GIVE <br />CONSIDERATiUN TO THIS FACT AND WHICH WILL BE USED IN RENDERING BILLS TO THESE <br />tIWONSUMERS. <br />THE PROPOSED NEW WATER RATE WILL INCREASE THE WATER REVENUES APPROXIMATELY <br />530,000.00 PER ANNUM. THIS ADDITIONAL REVENUE IS NECESSARY iN ORDER TO OFFSET <br />INCREASED OPERATING COSTS, SUCH AS LABOR, PUMPING, CHEtdICALS, AND DEBT CHARGES <br />FOR THE BONDS RECENTLY ISSUED FOR THE NEW FILTER PLANT. THIS RATE, IF PUT INTO <br />EFFECT, WILL KEEP THE WATER DEPARTMENT ON A SELF-SUSxTAINING BASIS AND WILL <br />ENABLE IT TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE GENERAL FUND OF THE I.ITY AN AMOUNT EQUIVALENT <br />TO TAXES, LICENSES, ETC., WHICH WOULD BE PAID TO THE CITY IF THE WATER <br />DEPARTMENT WAS OWNED AND OPERATED BY A PRIVATE COMPANY. <br />IN ADDITION TO THE INCREASED RATES FOR WATER, WE ALSO RECOMMEND THAT A <br />CHARGE OF 51.v0 BE MADE EACH TIME A WATER OR GAS SERVICE• IS TURNED ON. THIS <br />CHARGE WILL PRODUCE ABOUT 52000.00 IN WATER REVENUES AND A LIKE SUM IN GAS <br />REVENUES AND SHOULD BE MADE, IN OUR OPINION, TO OFFSET THE EXTRA EXPENSE <br />INVOLVED FOR TURNING ON AND SERVICING NEW ArCOUNTS. <br />WE ARE ATTACHING, FOR COMPARATIVE PURPOSES, A STATEMENT WHICH SHOWS THE <br />PRESENT AND PROppSED COSTS OF WATER FOR THE STATED NUMBER OF CUBIC FEET. <br />YOUR UTILITIES COMMITTEE RE AIRES THAT THE LEVYING OF THE SEWER TAX AND <br />THE INCREASED WATER RATES IS NOT A PLEASANT TASK, BUT WE BELIEVE THAT THE <br />METHOD PROPOSED BY OUR COMMITTEE OFFERS THE BEST SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM <br />WHICH MUST BE SOLVED AT THIS TIME. <br />o.-.._.. <br />