Laserfiche WebLink
33 <br />THE FOREGOING ESTIMATE WAS APPROVED BY THE SCHOOL BOARD OF <br />THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE AT A SPECIAL MEETING ON MAY 12, 1959. <br />• R. S. GOODMAN, ~R. (SIGNED) <br />CHAIRMAN, SCHOOL BOARD <br />CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA <br />THE FOLLOWING REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION WAS PRESENTED: <br />MAY 15, 1959 <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />CITY HALL <br />CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA <br />GENTLEMEN: <br />THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION WISHES TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING <br />RECOMMENDATION ON THE LEWIS STREET MAffER REFERRED TO THEM BY THE <br />CITY COUNCIL ON MAY 4, 1959. <br />REPORT - PLANNING COMM. RE: <br />LEWIS STREET IT iS THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT LEWIS <br />STREET IS NOT NECESSARY IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF TRAFFIC AND THAT IF THE <br />LEGAL PROBLEMS ARE SOLVED, IT WOULD NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE CITY~S <br />STREET SYSTEM TO CLOSE IT. <br />RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, <br />THOMPSDN A. DYKE (SIGNED) <br />CITY PLANNING ENGINEER <br />TAD:sB <br />THE FOLLOWING REPORT OF THECITY ATTORNEY WAS PRESENTED; <br />MAY 12, 1959 <br />TO: THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />CITY OFCHARLOTTESVILLE <br />GENTLEMEN: <br />REPORT - CITY ATTORNEY RE: <br />LEWIS STREET AT THE LAST REGULARLY CALLED MEETING ON MONDAY MAY 4, 1959, THE <br />CITY ATTORNEY WAS REQUESTED TO RENDER AN OPINION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />AND TO THE COUNCIL ON THE FEASIBILITY OF CLOSING LEWIS STREET BETWEEN <br />EDNTAINE AVENUE TO MAURY AVENUE. <br />BY THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, SECTION 13, PARAGRAPH <br />FIRST, THE COUNCIL HAS THE EXPRESS AUTHORITY TO CLOSE OR VACATE STREETS <br />WITHIN THEIR JURISDICTION. THE APPROPRIATE STATE STATUTES, ~ 15-766, <br />15-766.1, 15-766.2 VA. CODE ANN. (1950), SET FORTH THE PROCEDURE WHICH IS <br />TO BE USED IN ACCOMPLISHING THE RIGHT OF THE CITY TO CLOSE A STREET. <br />SECTION 15-766.1 AND 15-766.2 ARE UNAVAILABLE TO THE CITY AT THIS <br />TIME SINCE BY THE EVIDENCE OF MR. BRUNGER AT THE COUNCIL HEARING ON MAY 4, <br />1959, THERE SEEMED TO BE PROPERTY OWNERS 4lHICH FALL 1JITHIN THE DEFINITIONS <br />OF INTERESTED PARTIES AS SET FORTH IN 15-766.2, WHO ARE OPPOSED TO THE <br />CLOSING OF THE STREET. SECTION 15-766.1 EXPRESSLY PROVIDES THAT A STREET <br />CAN NOT BE VACATED IF IT ABRIDGES THE RIGHTS OF INTERESTED PARTIES. <br />HOWEVER, UNDER S 15-766 VA. CODE ~NN. (195H SUPPL.) IT WOULD SEEM THAT <br />ANY PROPERTY OWNER WHO MEETS THE STATUTORY REQUISITES AND WHO OESlRED TO <br />CLOSE THE STREET HAS ANOTHER REMEDY. THIS WOULD BE THAT UPON APPLICATION <br />BY THE PROPERTY OWNER, THE COUNCIL WOULD APPOINT THREE TO FIVE VIEWERS WHO <br />WOULD BE PAID BY THE APPLICANT AND WHO WOULD MAKE A REPORT TO THE COUNCIL <br />PURSUANT TO ~ 15-766. IT WOULD THEN BE THE COUNCIL'S DECISION AS TO <br />WHETHER TO CLOSE THE STREET OR NOT BASED UPON THE VIEWERS REPORT AND OTHER <br />EVIDENCE IF ANY. <br />THEREFORE, IT IS MY OPINION THAT AS THE CONTROVERSY CURRENTLY IS PRESENTED, <br />THE CITY CAN NOT CLOSE OR VACATE LEWIS STREET BETWEEN FDNTAINE AVENUE ANO <br />MAURY AVENUE. <br />RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, <br />PAUL D.SUMMERS~ JR. (SIGNED) <br />CITY ATTORNEY <br />MR. EARL BRUNGER AND OTHERS WERE PRESENT AND A COPY OF THE CITY ATTORNEY S <br />REPORT WAS GIVEN TO MR. BRUNGER. HE 1JAS ADVISED THAT IF HE WISHED TO PURSUE <br />THE MATTER FURTHER, HE SHOULD FOLLOW PARAGRAPH 4 OF THE CITY ATTORNEYtS REPORT. <br />AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "ANNUAL TAX LEVY IMPOSING TAXES ON PERSONS AND PROPERTY <br />ANNUAL TAX LEVY ORDINANCE <br />ADOPTED. FOR THE PAYMENT OF INTEREST OF THE CITY DEBT, FOR CREATING A SINKING FUND THEREFOR, <br />FOR THE SUPPORT OF CITY GOVERNMF_NT AND THE CITY SCHOOLS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES", was <br />OFFERED BY MR. 4~EINBERG, SECONDED BY MR. DAVI$ AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CHARLOT- <br />TESVILLE CITY COUNCIL ON APRIL 20, 1959, AND CARRIED OVER TO A SPECIAL MEETING OF <br />THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE ON APRIL 30, 1959 AND SUBSEQUENTLY <br />CARRIED OVER TO A MEETING OF THE COUNCIL PRIOR TO MAY 31, 1959, WAS REOFFERED BY <br />