My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-06-18
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2007
>
2007-06-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2008 1:07:40 PM
Creation date
7/15/2008 1:07:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8 <br /> <br /> Ms. Tammy Londeree, 813 Locust Avenue, Apt. C, said she has felt <br />uncomfortable as a pedestrian going through the crossing, but feels it is better for <br />merchants. She said it needs to be made safer for children. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tim Hulbert, 2246 Brandywine Drive, complimented the City for the <br />th <br />thorough report. He reminded Council that the 4 Street crossing is a replacement for <br />thth <br />crossings lost at 6 Street and 7 Street. He said in order for the mall to be vibrant, safe <br />and accessible, signage, pedestrians, vehicles and parking are required. He said the <br />th <br />merchants and public support the 4 Street crossing. <br /> <br /> As there were no further speakers, the public hearing was closed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch said he thought we would mostly see subjective data, which is what we <br />mostly see, but said there is some objective data. He noted that major construction work <br />was being done on the east end of the mall before the crossing was opened. He said he is <br />surprised that the pedestrian numbers went down, and thinks we should be concerned <br />about this and monitor the situation. He said we need to look longer term He said he <br />th <br />thinks if we keep the crossing then 5 Street makes more sense as that would create a <br />longer uninterrupted expanse of mall. He said he would reverse the circulation, and does <br />th <br />not think it will create more cut through traffic. He also said he would reopen 4 Street <br />at the railroad crossing. Regarding circulation, he said it would be easier for pedestrians <br />th <br />to see cars making left hand turns. He said if the crossing is at 5 Street and the <br />circulation reversed, it would allow a better tourist experience in the Court Square area. <br />He said it would also make it easier to drive by the garage when there are events and see <br />when it is full. <br /> <br />thth <br /> Ms. Hamilton asked if there are cost advantages between the 4 and 5 Street <br />crossing. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tolbert said that the cost estimates are essentially the same and assume <br />th <br />undergrounding of utilities. He said the street would have to be rebuilt on 5 Street and <br />curbing would need to be added on the south side. <br /> <br /> Ms. Hamilton acknowledged the comment that this is a different Council than the <br />one that approved the crossing, but she said it is also a different one than made promises <br />not to open a crossing. She said she has been working on the mall since the crossing <br />th <br />opened, and most of the time she has never noticed that the 4 Street crossing was there, <br />and when she did she cars were respectful and careful. She said she thinks a good job has <br />been done balancing safety. She said she is sympathetic about the opinion based data. <br />She said she does not know enough about why the decrease in pedestrian traffic, and said <br />she has not noticed any particular problem, but would be interested in monitoring the <br />th <br />situation. She said she favors a permanent crossing at 4 Street. <br /> <br /> Mr. Norris said he thinks the crossing has negatively affected the pedestrian <br />experience, appearance and perceptions of safety. He said the question is do the benefits <br />outweigh the negatives, and he said he has not seen that they do. He noted that most <br />merchants say the crossing has had no impact. He said people have adjusted to the <br />crossing, but he does not think that makes it right. He said we need to figure out how to <br />bring more pedestrians downtown. He said he thinks there are many things we can and <br />should do to improve businesses, including, having drop off points for people with <br />disabilities, loading zones, parking, signage and transit. He said we need to bring a <br />broader range of customers downtown. He said he supports a comprehensive study of the <br />mall. He said a permanent crossing will cost a significant amount of money, and we do <br />not know exactly what it will cost. He said he does not favor a permanent crossing and <br />thinks there are other things we should be doing. <br /> <br />th <br /> Mr. Taliaferro said he supports a permanent crossing at 4 Street. He said he is <br />swayed by what he has heard from the business community that it is important to them to <br />keep it open, and feels it is important to the future of downtown. He said he crosses the <br />street frequently and does not see a problem. He said he does see JAUNT use the <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.