2007-10-01 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

6 Mr. Stratton Salidas, 414 E. Main Street, said that the conditions for the parkway have not been met. He said it would be better to vote for a conservation easement and stop the road. He asked why Council is talking about this before the conditions are met. th He said a 4/5 vote is needed by the Virginia constitution. He said we should make sure the roads gets federal review. Ms. Jennifer Connor said she supports many of the points made, and is concerned about the health of the stream. She said she is concerned that the bike/pedestrian bridge has been taken out. She said the City should encourage bicycling. Mr. Richard Collins, 108 Wilson Court, asked why this item was put on the agenda unless Council wants to show its cooperation with the County. He said this is not a City versus County issue, it is a growth issue. He said City leadership is needed. He said that those speakers in favor of the parkway speak for businesses, and those opposed represent neighborhoods. He said the parkway and interchange are only separate for a legal issue. He urged Council not to do anything until residents look at all three projects. th Mr. Francis Fife, 501 9 Street, S.W. said building of the road is a violation of the spirit of McIntire’s gift to the City, it will cause destruction of a beautiful park, will cause destruction of the Rivanna Trail Foundation trail; will bring more traffic north and south, and will undermine efforts toward development of mass transit. He said it will not add more jobs, parking or affordable housing and will be very expensive. Mr. John Salidas, 414 E. Main Street, said we do not need to destroy a park to connect the City and County. He said he is totally against the road. Mr. Chad Freckman, 104 Northwood Circle, said Council is talking about alternative transportation yet is building roads. He said the traffic backs up on McIntire Road now, and without the interchange funding the road will fail unless all pieces are in place. Mr. Daniel Bluestone, 501 Park Hill, said the Council’s 2006 letter was very clear and we are not there yet with the conditions about the parkland, interchange and bike and pedestrian access. He said people do not know what the interchange will look like. Delegate David Toscano, 628 Evergreen Avenue, said that when he was first elected to Council he was an ardent opponent of the parkway. He said he lives downtown and thinks that Council should move forward. He said the road is part of a network of roads, transit and walkways. He said we are not the only players in the game. He said we have to work with Albemarle County on a transit authority. He said people in Richmond might decide to redirect the funding. He said the City and County need to start to build on a grid, and help set the stage for other transportation needs down the road. Ms. Barbara Smith, 501 Park Hill, said that just because something is historical, Council should use their own minds. She suggested that the money be given to Northern Virginia for roads. A resident of 129 Goodman Street opposed the road because he said it contributes to having to drive around neighborhoods instead of walking around them. As there were no further speakers, the public hearing was closed. Dr. Brown said there are two threads: have the conditions been met or do we not move forward at all. He asked for a straw vote from Councilors about whether they agree to move forward if certain conditions are met. Mr. Lynch said he would if they are all met, but questioned why now. Dr. Brown, Ms. Hamilton, Mr. Lynch, and Mr. Taliaferro said they would agree to move forward if certain conditions are met, but Mr. Norris said he would not.