Laserfiche WebLink
13 <br />January and suggested holding a forum. He said he would favor increasing the funding <br />from revenue sharing for the CIP, but phasing it in gradually. He said a priority for him <br />is attracting and retaining police officers. He said the proposed budget calendar seems <br />fine. He said he would like to see a specific proposal for the dedicated fund for <br />affordable housing. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch said he is not in favor of making the bus service free, but would like to <br />see a shift of serious resources into transit. He said we are close to being able to do a <br />backbone feeder system. He said he shares the desire to put an emphasis on stormwater <br />infrastructure. <br /> <br /> Mr. Norris said he agrees with Mr. Lynch about transit, though ultimately he <br />would like to see it be fare free. He said he would like to shorten headways this year. He <br />said he is not big on determining school funding based on teacher performance, but <br />would be willing to provide an incentive for reducing the drop out rate. He said he will <br />take the idea of a dedicated fund for affordable housing to the Housing Committee. <br /> <br /> Mr. Taliaferro made a motion to approve the proposed budget guidelines. <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch seconded the motion, but said he would like to target the increase at <br />5%. <br /> <br /> Mr. O’Connell said that if Council wants to do new things it might be hard with a <br />target of 5%. <br /> <br /> Mr. Norris suggested that instead of adopting a 5% target, staff synthesize it and <br />bring it back. <br /> <br /> Dr. Brown said Council can add a target of no more than 5% increase and revisit <br />it during the budget process. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch said there is logic in putting more revenue sharing funds into the CIP. <br /> <br /> Dr. Brown suggested increasing the amount from revenue sharing to the CIP <br />without designating an amount. <br /> <br /> Mr. Taliaferro and Mr. Lynch accepted the additional guideline proposals and the <br />guidelines, as proposed, with the target of a 5% increase and increasing the amount of <br />revenue sharing funds to the CIP, was approved by the following vote. Ayes: Dr. <br />Brown, Ms. Hamilton, Mr. Lynch, Mr. Norris, Mr. Taliaferro. Noes: None. <br /> <br />REPORT <br />: SMITH POOL REDEVELOPMENT <br /> <br /> Mr. Svetz said that Council was presented a feasibility study for Smith Pool <br />redevelopment in October and Council asked that the proposal be brought back with three <br />changes: reducing the square footage; increasing lap lanes to six; and revising the <br />construction estimate. He said the square footage has been reduced by 5,600 square feet, <br />and the glazing and glass have been reduced. He said that if Council approves the <br />conceptual plan detailed drawings can be done. He said the cost estimate has been <br />reduced to $9.8 million. <br /> <br /> Responding to a question from Dr. Brown, Mr. Svetz said the pools can be <br />separated. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch said he thinks the cost can be reduced to $8 million. He asked if we <br />successfully negotiate with the YMCA do we really need six lanes. He noted that the <br />County did not put the $1.25 million in their budget for additional lanes at the YMCA. <br /> <br /> Ms. Hamilton noted that the swim coach said that the facility could be used for <br />ACC meets and other economic projects and could be a money maker, not just a <br />community facility. She said that rather than give the YMCA $2 million she would like <br />to see it approached differently. She said she supports Smith Pool. <br /> <br />