My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-11-19
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2007
>
2007-11-19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2008 1:25:11 PM
Creation date
7/15/2008 1:25:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8 <br />development in the City and the City is not static relative to growth. He urged Council to <br />be thoughtful. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tom Jones, a resident of Albemarle County who lives adjacent to the <br />Rivanna Reservoir, said he is concerned about the sustainability of the reservoir because <br />of the amount of siltation, and encouraged Council and RWSA to re-explore the situation. <br />He said siltation is caused by development in the City as well. <br /> <br /> As there were no further speakers, the public hearing was closed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch said that the focus in developing the water supply plan was preventing <br />a bad idea (James River option), and we jumped at the alternative. He said we have not <br />asked if this is the best we can do locally. He said he does not think so. He said we have <br />a 50 year plan but nothing requires us to build it all at once right now. He said we should <br />plan on how we can do it incrementally. He said he is concerned about the cost to the <br />City and the loss of land and water quality. He said we should talk to the County about <br />protecting the rivers. He said it is debatable about how much of the $140 million is for <br />growth versus maintenance. He said he would guess a lot is for expansion. He said <br />water usage in the City has steadily declined, but the cost has doubled since 2000. He <br />expressed concern about the cost doubling again, but being unable to point to anything <br />better. He said there are bigger issues we need to look at. He said we have to repair the <br />Ragged Mountain dam, but he thinks there will be better options in 20 years. He said the <br />cheaper option would be to put a bladder at the South Fork dam, which would cost <br />between $10 and $12 million, but it was shot down by the Army Corps of Engineers. He <br />said he does think the current regulations will be in place in 20 years. He said there is <br />also the Quarry option, and he thinks dredging is a huge option. He said we should <br />maintain what we have at the South Fork reservoir. He said he thinks we will see cheaper <br />dredging techniques. He said there has been a good start with the public process and <br />plan. He said we should be careful before we sign onto a $140 million project when the <br />City does not need it. He said RWSA needs to come up with replacement park land. <br /> <br /> Mr. Norris said he agrees with much of what Mr. Lynch has said. He said some <br />of the requests made by Dr. Mooney seem reasonable, and said he would like more <br />information on the cost estimates. He said there is a lot of merit in the idea of analyzing <br />the alternatives, including a better analysis of siltation prevention. He said he strongly <br />agrees about compensation for lost park land and one for one tree replacement. <br /> <br /> Mr. Taliaferro said he agrees with Mr. Lynch and Mr. Norris. He asked if <br />Council was in such a hurry that some options were disregarded. He said he would like <br />to take a closer look at dredging. <br /> <br /> Dr. Brown noted that Council spent a lot of time on this issue, and was provided a <br />lot of information about dredging. He said the cost was huge, especially for treatment <br />and storage. He said several joint meetings were held with Albemarle County officials. <br />He said the environmental community pushed to keep the supply in the watershed. He <br />said our hands are tied by the rules. He said we cannot develop a plan based on our hope <br />that the regulations will change in 20 years. He noted that the plan was approved by a <br />unanimous vote of the Council and the Board of Supervisors. He said one of the big <br />positives of the plan is restoring the health of the Mormon’s River. He said a big <br />challenge is how to pay for the plan. He said he would like to implement more storage, <br />noting that we are in a drought right now. Dr. Brown said it would be great to look more <br />at dredging and to see if there is cheap technology that would allow us to protect the <br />reservoir even if it did not increase the water supply. He said he is interested in being <br />responsive to the concerns he has heard, such as new dredging techniques, cost share, and <br />ways to compensate the community for loss of land. He noted that the land was acquired <br />for the purpose of having a reservoir. <br /> <br /> Ms. Hamilton said there does not appear to be a plan for the siltation in the <br />reservoir. She suggested exploring putting it at Panorama Farms. She agreed there was a <br />tremendous effort in coming up with a plan, but noted that there were no meetings after <br />the plan was approved. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.