My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-02-08
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2008
>
2008-02-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2008 2:19:18 PM
Creation date
7/15/2008 2:19:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING <br /> <br />A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY COUNCIL WILL BE <br />HELD ON Friday, February 8, 2008 AT 12:00 noon IN THE Basement Conference <br />Room. <br /> <br />THE PROPOSED AGENDA IS AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br /> Luncheon Meeting with School Board <br /> <br />BY ORDER OF THE MAYOR BY: Jeanne Cox <br /> <br />BASEMENT CONFERENCE ROOM – February 8, 2008 <br /> <br /> Council met in special session on this date with the following members present: <br />Ms. Edwards, Mr. Huja, Mr. Norris, Mr. Taliaferro. Absent: Dr. Brown. <br /> <br /> Mr. Ned Michie, Chairman of the School Board, said that the meeting will focus <br />on the proposed retention incentive for School employees. <br /> <br /> Faye Giglio, Director of Human Resources for City Schools, explained that a <br />proposal is being developed as an incentive to retain teachers and possibly all School <br />staff. To qualify an employee must have been in the City School System at least ten <br />consecutive years, be at least 50 years old, and retire from VRS. They would be eligible <br />for a an annual payment up until the age of 65 on the condition that they provide 15 days <br />of service to the School System each year. She said we have a stronger school system <br />when we retain teachers. She noted that the details are still being developed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Ed Gillaspie, Director of Finance for City Schools, said that the initial cost of <br />the proposal would be approximately 1% of payroll, or between $300,000 and $400,000. <br />He said it would be expected to cost more the first few years and then level out. <br /> <br /> Mr. Michie said one issue is whether to apply this to all staff or just teachers. He <br />said it would create morale problems to apply it just to teachers. <br /> <br /> Mr. Norris asked if systematic exit interviews are conducted to find out why <br />teachers are leaving. <br /> <br /> Ms. Giglio said an exit survey is done. She said pay is one reason people leave, <br />but just moving away is another, and noted that it is hard to generalize. She said they are <br />targeting people who have a choice of where they work. <br /> <br /> Responding to a question from Mr. Taliaferro, Ms. Giglio said that the retired <br />teachers could provide service as substitutes, consultants or staff development. She said <br />it would create a pool of people that could be tapped into. <br /> <br /> Mr. Norris said it sounds like a good program, but he said the School Board needs <br />to be mindful that our real estate assessments are flat, and this will have impact on <br />funding, especially in the future. <br /> <br /> Mr. Huja said he generally agrees with the need for incentives, but wondered if <br />there are other ways to provide them. <br /> <br /> Ms. Kathy Galvin, School Board member, said she believes that younger teachers <br />are looking at the here and now rather than farther out toward retirement. <br /> <br /> Mr. Michie said he hears from teachers that they want this type of incentive <br />program. <br /> <br /> Ms. Giglio said this proposal was developed at the request of staff who have been <br />asking for something at retirement. She said other incentives are still being explored. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.