2008-11-25 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

2 from the borings that GF suggested would increase the cost of the dam from previous estimates. There was also some question about the future demand needs. He did not know where it was pointed out that the past studies were inaccurate. There were also questions about how much more water could be conserved, which has also been studied and is ongoing. Mr. Dennis Rooker, Board of Supervisors, said that based on information from Tom Frederick that potential cost of these studies could be $750,000 to $1 million figure and could take 9 months to 1 ½ years to complete, the Board of Supervisors felt it necessary to meet with the other boards to discuss these issues Mr. Tom Frederick, Executive Director of Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority said that staff information is not detailed and were ballpark estimates. Mr. Rooker said RWSA had planned to issue an RFP to retain an expert panel to conduct a review of the Ragged Mountain project data. He asked Mr. Frederick if the RFP was expanded to include additional elements as outlined in City Council’s resolution, how long it would take to update the RFP. Mr. Frederick said the expert panel being suggested would consist of representation by multiple firms. After solicitations were received, experts would be selected from possibly more than one of these firms. It could possibly involve more than one contract being developed. He said he feels that the scope of the panel process would be determined after the panel members are selected and a moderator chosen. He said a dredging feasibility study, water conservation, and the pipeline feasibility study could be undertaken by individual firms. The question is whether you would like individual firms to undertake these studies independent of the dam expert panel. There would be a higher cost associated with having individual studies be further reviewed by a panel. Dr. Brown asked if the expertise desired for the expert panel would fit with a study of the pipeline alternative as well as to its feasibility. Mr. Frederick responded that it would be fair to say that there would be individuals who would be qualified to review the Ragged Mountain Dam project data as well as the feasibility of the pipeline. RWSA did not want to connect the two studies because they wanted the best dam experts to review the data and not be restricted to firms that could also do the pipeline work. Mr. Norris asked if RWSA had an estimate on the cost for the expert panel to review the dam design work. Mr. Frederick replied that when discussing the expert panel with the Board of Supervisors, contacts had not yet been made to solicit some ballpark figures. Within the context of some of the phone calls he made after November 3, he would estimate on the low end of about $150,000 to $200,000 or possibly $300,000. Mr. Norris replied that the reason for the November 3 resolution was to avoid finding out sometime in the future that the pipeline project will cost much more than estimated or there are other obstacles that would be problematic. City Council was not asking that the expert panel conduct an independent engineering analysis on the pipeline, but to review all the available information and provide their best objective opinion as to whether this was the best approach. Mr. Boyd asked if City Council envisions holding a public input process during the pipeline review. Mr. Norris said he feels it would be very similar to what was being suggested for the review of the Ragged Mountain Dam project. There is a lot of information on hand that the panel would review in order to reassure the public that this proposal is sound. The water conservation element would require some analysis and probably some public engagement. He said Ridge Schuyler from The Nature Conservancy estimated that this study would cost no more than $50,000. The dredging feasibility study would probably