My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1996-09-22
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1996
>
1996-09-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2001 5:07:35 PM
Creation date
11/13/2001 3:34:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
9/22/1996
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
164 <br /> <br />Preschool programs <br />Aids in elementa~ classroom <br />Support staff <br />Libraries <br />Arts <br />Special education <br />C1P implications <br />Systematic sur~ey of parents to see what they identi~ as stren~hs/weaknesses <br />Demographics and tenure of staff/students <br />Informal policies, such as teacher/student conferences <br />Textbooks, materials, supplies, equipment <br />Expectations of teachers (maintenance of classrooms, etc.) <br />Degree of parental involvement <br />How do you put together a consolidated school system <br /> <br /> Mr. Cox said he feels a plan for the schools must be negotiated with the County before <br />the City would agree to consolidation. ' <br /> <br /> Mr. Toscano noted that some of the impact of consolidation is already known as a <br />result of the first study, and feels the question is whether the County is willing to raise their <br />level of spending in all their schools. <br /> <br /> Ms. Daugherty said she thinks the City could articulate and negotiate what is important <br />in the schools to maintain. <br /> <br /> Mr. Cox said he feels assumptions have to be built into the study about what is <br />important to the City. <br /> <br /> Mr. Clyde Gouldman, City Attorney, cautioned that negotiated agreements regarding <br />school programming may not go into perpetuity, and suggested that additional legal advice be <br />sought on this issue. <br /> <br /> On motion by Ms. Daugherty, seconded by Ms. Richards, Council unanimously voted <br />to meeting in executive session for the purpose of consultation with legal counsel and <br />briefings by staff members, consultants or attorneys, pertaining to probable litigation, or other <br />specific legal matters requiring the provision of legal advice by counsel, as authorized by <br />Section 2.1-344(A)(7) of the Virginia Code. The substance of the matters to be discussed <br />can reasonably be identified as follows:~ changes in the form of local government structure, <br />and related alternatives. An executive session on this subject is also authorized by Section <br />15.1-945.7(D) of the Virginia Code. <br /> <br /> Council reconvened in open session and, on motion by Ms. Daugherty, seconded by <br />Ms. Richards, certified that, to the best of each member's knowledge, (i) only public business <br />matters la~a~ully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in <br />the executive meeting to which this certification resolution applies, and (ii) only such public <br />business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were <br />heard, discussed or considered by the Council. <br /> <br />The meeting was convened for the evening. <br /> <br />GRAVES MOUNTAIN LODGE - September 23, 1996 <br /> <br /> Council reconvened the special session with the following members present: Mr. Cox, <br />Ms. Daugherty, Ms. Richards, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Toscano. <br /> <br /> Councilors discussed their Work/Action plan for the upconfing year, working from the <br />priorites previously discussed. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.