Laserfiche WebLink
52 <br /> <br />technology, multi-cultural diversity, and community outreach. Dr. DiCroce stated that <br />PVCC is receiving level funding from the state. <br /> <br /> Mr. Vandever questioned whether increased bus service to PVCC would be useful, <br />especially in light of additional evening and weekend classes, as had been discussed at the <br />Transit work session Council recently held, and Dr. DiCroce stated that she would provide <br />information on this issue to Council. <br /> <br /> Ms. Slaughter recommended that Dr. DiCroce also provide input on the proposed route <br />changes to the bus service. <br /> <br /> Responding to a question from Ms. Slaughter, Dr. DiCroce stated that while PVCC has <br />more scholarships available now than ever before, increases in tuition do make a difference in <br />people's ability to go to school. <br /> <br />PRESENTATION: CHARLOTTESVILLE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY <br />ADVISORY COMMITTEE <br /> <br /> Ms. Hannah Twaddell, Senior Transportation Planner for the Thomas Jefferson <br />Planning District Commission, speaking on behalf of the Charlottesville Area transportation <br />Study (CATS) Advisory Committee, explained that the purpose of the transportation plan is <br />to guide the development of large transportation projects and a set of policies and goals are <br />being developed to update the plan in four areas: economy, environment, neighborhood, and <br />access to community facilities. <br /> <br /> Responding to a question from Ms. Daugherty about the term "restricting parking <br />downtown," Ms. Twaddell stated that a goal is to open up short-term parking spaces and <br />guide longer-term parking into garages, adding that money is the biggest incentive to <br />encourage people to use alternative transportation. <br /> <br /> Mr. Vandever noted that a heavy emphasis is placed on protection of the environment <br />in the plan. <br /> <br /> Mr. Toscano made the following comments about the proposed policies and goals: <br />concern that the goal of providing 24-hour transportation may be unrealistic; suggested the <br />phrase "specific centers include but are not limited to; recommended exploring additional rail <br />transportation due to renewed interest and establishment of a state advisory group; adding <br />"single" occupancy auto on page 3; recommended that the U. Va. consider limiting <br />automobile use by first and second year students; and suggested that the School Board be <br />made aware of the recommendation regarding limiting car use by students at public schools. <br /> <br />REPORT: PROPOSED SALE OF HIGH STREET PARKING LOT <br /> <br /> Mr. Gouldman presented Council with a memorandum of intent proposed by McGuire, <br />Woods, Battle, and Boothe for the exchange of the City-owned lot on High Street for the <br />two buildings owned by McGuire, Woods on 5th and Jefferson Streets. If the proposals is <br />found to be feasible, Mr. Gouldman explained that McGuire, Woods would build office space <br />on the High Street lot which would require Board of Architectural Review approval. Mr. <br />Gouldman stated that the presumption is that the property currently owned by McGuire, <br />Woods has a higher value than the High Street property, and they would contribute the <br />difference to the City. Mr. Gouldman stated that approving the memorandum of intent <br />would give the City the opportunity to evaluate the property value. Mr. Gouldman continued <br />that if the exchange concept is approved, Council could give broad instructions to staffto <br />negotiate with McGuire, Woods, and bring back a document for formal approval. <br /> <br /> Mr. Toscano noted that only approval of the concept of the property exchange is before <br />Council at this time and, if approved, the actual sale of the property would require two <br />readings and there would be an opportunity for public input during the process. <br /> <br /> <br />