My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1994-12-16
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1994
>
1994-12-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2001 8:36:51 PM
Creation date
11/14/2001 6:30:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
12/16/1994
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
103 <br /> <br />NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETiNG <br /> <br />A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE COUNCIL WILL BE HELD ON Friday, December 16, <br />1994 AT 9:00 a.m. in the County Office Building, Rooms 5/6. <br /> <br />THE PROPOSED AGENDA IS AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />Meeting with Albemarle County Board of Supervisors re: Jail Issues <br /> <br />BY ORDER OF THE MAYOR <br /> <br />BY Jeanne Cox (signed) <br /> <br />ALBEMARLE COUNTY OFFICE BI~LDING - December 16, 1994 <br /> <br /> Council met in special session on this date with the following members present: Ms. <br />Daugherty, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Toscano, Mr. Vandever. Absent: Rev. Edwards. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mitchell Neuman, Chairman of the Charlottesville-Albemarle Jail Board, explained <br />that the meeting is being held to provide the Council and Board of Supervisors 'with <br />information to enable them to make an informed decision about: 1) whether to support the <br />Jail Board's expansion plans; and 2) if so, is establishing a Jail Authority the best way to fund <br />the expansion. Mr. Neuman stated that an Authority would allow both governmental bodies <br />to retain control by allowing them to approve major projects before they are implemented. <br />Mr. Neuman stated that if support exists for an Authority, the decision should be made by <br />February 1, 1995. Mr. Neuman stated that the funding request for the $15.4 million total <br />project, $7.7 million of which would be state funding, has been approved by the Department <br />of Corrections. If approved by the localities and the General Assembly, bonds would be <br />issued for the entire $15.4 rcfillion and the state would reimburse the localities. <br /> <br /> Mr. Ed Powell, the consultant who conducted the needs assessment for the Jail Board, <br />stated that the Jail Board developed a community based corrections plan which was approved <br />by the state, after which a planning study was completed. The study looked at the arrest <br />records and inmate population for locally responsible inmates, state responsible iranates who <br />are housed for brief periods of time, and federal prisoners who are outside the scope of the <br />corrections plan, and forecast that in the year 2003 there would be 367 local and state <br />inmates needing to be housed at the Joint Security Complex. As a result of this forecast, Mr. <br />Powell recommended that the Complex be expanded to house 440 total beds. Mr. Powell <br />stated that he believes that the forecast is reasonable in light of the increase in the inmate <br />population seen between 1983 and 1993 and with the state's system of less parole. <br /> <br /> Ms. Slaughter asked what would prevent an explosion of state prisoners who would <br />stay in the local jail longer than the 60-90 days the localities are required to keep them if new <br />state facilities are not constructed in time to prevent this from occurring. <br /> <br /> Mr. Powell stated that new legislation removes the discretion formerly given to the <br />Director of Corrections that allowed the Director to make a decision to keep state prisoners <br />longer periods of time in local jails, unless the Governor declares an emergency. Mr. Powell <br />noted that the localities may need to go to court to force the state to house the state prisoners <br />after the 60-90 day period if the state does not move them voluntarily. <br /> <br /> Mr. Toscano asked whether the needs assessment did a breakdown ofx4olent versus <br />non-violent prisoners, and Mr. Powell replied that was not done in the assessment, though <br />one coUld assume that sentences of two years or less represent non-violent offenses. <br /> <br /> Mr. Toscano stated that he would like more information on violent versus non-violent <br />prisoners forecast since it may a difference in the number of beds needed if there are <br />alternatives to incarceration for non-violent prisoners. Mr. Toscano expressed an interest in <br />assessing needs for juvenile offenders. <br /> <br /> Mr. Powell explained that state law, requires that juveniles be separated from adults and <br />a separate facility would probably need to be constructed for juveniles. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.