|
142
<br />
<br />ORDINANCE: SUBDIVISION AND ZONING AMENDMENTS (2nd reading)
<br />
<br /> Mr. Gouldman recommended that the ordinance be amended
<br />to include an appeal to Council on sidewalk and curb and
<br />gutter waivers to make the ordinance consistent with the R-lA
<br />zoning section.
<br />
<br /> On motion by Ms. Slaughter, seconded by Ms. Daugherty,
<br />the subdivision ordinance was amended to include the appeal
<br />to Council on sidewalk and curbs and gutter waivers, with
<br />Rev. Edwards absent for the vote.
<br />
<br /> The ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTIONS
<br /> 29-37, 29-63, 29-119, 29-120, 29-126, 34-4, 34-47, 34-106,
<br /> 34-141, 34-143, 34-173, 34-201, 34-221,34.-440, 34-470,
<br /> 34-472, 34-473, 34-473.1, ~34-474, 34-567, 134-569, 34-573,
<br /> 34-580, 34-700, 34-702, 34-723,34-732, 34-771, 34-781,
<br /> 34-805, 34-806, 34-834, 34-835, 34-857.3, 34-884, 34-905,
<br /> 34-938, 34-941, 34-977, 34-1009, AND 34-1032 OF CHAPTERS 29
<br /> AND 34 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, 1990, AS
<br /> ~4ENDED, RELATING TO ZONING AMENDMENTS," as amended, which
<br /> was offered at the October 4th meeting, was approved by the
<br /> following vote. Ayes: Ms. Daugherty, Ms. Slaughter, Mr.
<br /> Toscano, Mr. Vandever. Noes: None. Absent: Rev. Edwards.
<br />
<br />ORDINANCE: CABLE TV BASIC TIER RATE REGULATION (2nd reading)
<br />
<br /> Mr. Gould~an suggested two minor amendments to the cable
<br />ordinance: inclusion of the filing date and clarification of
<br />when the certification becomes effective.
<br />
<br /> On motion by Ms. Daugherty, seconded by Ms. Slaughter,
<br />the ordinance was amended as recommended by Mr. Gouldman,
<br />with Rev. Edwards absent.
<br />
<br /> The ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE GOVERNING THE
<br />PROCEDURES AND STANDARDS FOR THE REGULATION OF CABLE
<br />TELEVISION RATES PURSUANT TO THE RULES OF THE FEDERAL
<br />COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND THE CABLE TELEVISION CONSUMER
<br />PROTECTION AND COMPETITION ACT OF 1992," as amended, which
<br />was offered at the October 8th meeting, was approved by the
<br />following vote. Ayes: Ms. Daugherty, Ms. Slaughter, Mr.
<br />Toscano, Mr. Vandever. Noes: None. Absent: Rev. Edwards.
<br />
<br />ORDINANCE: CLOSING A PORTION OF LYMAN STREET
<br />
<br /> Mr. Hendrix explained that Lyman Street was a platted
<br />but unopened street and needed to be closed in order to be
<br />used for the access road into the National Optronics project.
<br />
<br /> Mr. Gouldman explained that the title company involved
<br />requested that the ordinance use the word abandoned rather
<br />than discontinued and that "and gutter" be removed as a
<br />condition.
<br />
<br /> On motion by Ms. Slaughter, seconded by Ms. Daugherty,
<br />the ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE CLOSING, VACATING AND
<br />ABANDONING LYMAN STREET," as changed by Mr. Gouldman, was
<br />offered and carried over to the next meeting for
<br />consideration.
<br />
<br />PUBLIC
<br />
<br />There were no matters by the public.
<br />
<br />OTHER BUSINESS
<br />
<br /> Mr. Gou!dman explained that as part of the Corner
<br />renovation project, liens were placed on unpaid assessments
<br />and one property owner has asked that the unpaid amount be
<br />subordinated to his new loan.
<br />
<br />Mr. Hendrix stated that the City worked with property
<br />
<br />
<br />
|