My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1997-04-11
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1997
>
1997-04-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2001 4:38:23 PM
Creation date
12/3/2001 3:50:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
4/11/1997
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
292 <br /> <br /> Ms. Richards asked if reversion costs will increase if the process taken longer than <br />anticipated and if funding for reversion is contained in the budget. <br /> <br /> Mr. O'Connell replied that it is possible that costs for reversion could increase, but the <br />budget contains no funding for reversion: Additional funding, if needed, would be made by <br />an appropriation by Council from the General Fund. <br /> <br /> The meeting was adjourned. <br />President ~ <br /> <br />Cte <br /> <br />NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING <br /> <br />A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE COUNCIL WILL BE HELD ON Friday, April 11, 1997 <br />AT 12:00 noon IN THE Second Floor Conference Room. <br /> <br />THE PROPOSED AGENDA IS AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />Reversion discussion/Meeting with voting district consultant <br /> <br />BY ORDER OF THE MAYOR <br /> <br />BY Jeanne Cox (signed) <br /> <br />SECOND FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM - April 11, 1997 <br /> <br /> Council met in special session on this date with the following members present: Mr. <br />Cox, Ms. Daugherty, Ms. Richards, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Toscano. <br /> <br /> Mr. Clyde Gouldman, City Attorney, said that progress is being made on appointment <br />of a special commissioner to verify the petition signatures. <br /> <br /> Dr. Rudolph Wilson, a Professor at Norfolk State University, the consultant proposed <br />to complete a study of potential voting districts should the City revert to town status, <br />explained that any changes in the voting districts or structure will have to be submitted to the <br />Justice Department for approval, and a major focus will be on whether a fair opportunity has <br />been provided for inclusion of minority representation. <br /> <br /> Mn Toscano asked if the assumption is that Justice Department clearance would be <br />required after a vote for reversion, and whether it would be possible to have reversion and a <br />situation where districts could not be drawn to satisfy the Justice Department. <br /> <br /> Dn Wilson replied that his assumption is that Justice Department clearance would <br />occur after reversion, and said that creation of voting districts usually are no problem unless <br />there is shown to be oven acts of discrimination, .especially if all parties are satisfied. Dr. <br />Wilson said that it would not be required to create any districts that are majority <br />African-American unless there would be obvious discrimination in not doing so. Dr. Wilson <br />said that another issue considered is whether candidates for election are residents' candidate <br />of choice. Dr. Wilson said that the 1990 census information would be used to determine the <br />new voting districts. <br /> <br /> Responding to a question from Mr. Cox, Dr. Wilson said fair oPportunity for inclusion <br />would be defined using demographics and history,~. : ~' ~'" <br /> <br /> Ms. Slaughter~asked if the Justice Department would consider'the actu~tl':~6hoo!. ' 'i <br />population when appi~oving districts for school b/~'~d elections, referring t0'the"P~{ :that the. <br />African-American population in the City Schools is significantly higher than-that in the <br />general population. Dr. Wilson replied that school boards generally have a larger <br />membership than local governments and it may be necessary to adjust the fomaula for electibn: <br />of a school board to address that, though there is no legal requirement to do so. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.