My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1989-07-17
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1989
>
1989-07-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2001 4:21:47 PM
Creation date
12/6/2001 3:14:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
7/17/1989
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
74 <br /> <br /> Mr. Towe stated that he felt it was fitting for this <br />Council to support the American flag. <br /> <br /> Ms. Waters stated that she would not vote in faVor of <br />the resolution as it would restrict freedom of speech, <br /> <br /> The resolution supporting a constitutional amendment <br />prohibiting burning of the American flag was defeated by the <br />following vote. Ayes: Mr. Towe. ' Noes: Mr. Buck, Rev. <br />Edwards, Mr. Vandever, Ms. Waters. <br /> <br /> Mr. Buck made a motion to support a resolution in <br />support of the American flag, the Fourth of July, ~and the <br />values they represent. Rev. Edwards seconded the motion and <br />it was unanimously approved by Council. <br /> <br /> Th~meeting was adjourned. <br /> <br />~r~ioent . ~rk <br /> <br /> Council met in regular session on this date with the <br />following members Present: Rev. Edwards, Mr. Towe,.Mr. <br />Vandeve~/ Ms. Waters. Absent: Mr. Buck. <br /> <br />MINUTES <br /> <br /> On motion by Rev. Edwards, seconded by Mr. Towe, the <br /> minutes of the June 26th meeting were approved as presented, <br /> with Mr. Vandever abstaining. <br /> <br /> On motion by Rev. Edwards, seconded by Mr. Vandever, the <br />minutes of the July 3rd meeting were approved as presented. <br /> <br />PUBLIC <br /> <br /> Mr. G. Edward White, a resident of Park Street and <br />representing the Neighborhood's Environment and Safety <br />CitizenS Association (NESCA), expressed concerns about <br />Virginia Power increasing the voltage levels and pruning <br />trees along Park Street. Mr. White recommended that <br />regulations be established for tree pruning which would <br />ensure full citizen participation prior to any further action <br />by Virginia Power. Mr. White also stated that there was <br />concern about the safety of the high voltage lines. <br /> <br /> Mr. Vandever questioned whether the City has the ability <br />to regulate Virginia Power with regard to tree pruning and <br />increasing voltage. <br /> <br /> Mr. Clyde Gouldman, City Attorney, explained that the <br />1935 franchise agreement regarding electric service gives the <br />City the authority to regulate the location of electric poles, <br />but noted that it was his understanding that Virginia Power <br />was not planning to install new poles. Mr. Gouldman stated <br />that the City may be able to negotiate a new franchise <br />agreement with Virginia Power. <br /> <br /> Mr. David Roop, District Manager for Virginia Power, <br />explained that the voltage along Park Street is scheduled to <br />increase to 35,000 volts in order to meet present and future <br />electric demands downtown and to minimize power outages. Mr. <br />Roop stated that the height of a few poles will be raised in <br />order to minimize the impact on trees and lines along East <br />Jefferson Street may be move to the opposite side of the <br />street. Mr. Roop stressed that tree trimming is expected to <br />be minimal. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.