My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-01-07
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2013
>
2013-01-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2013 9:37:17 AM
Creation date
12/2/2013 9:37:15 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 <br /> <br />REPORT: <br />STORMWATER UTILITY UPDATE <br /> <br />Ms. Riddervold presented to Council and said this project has been the result of <br />work done by Public Works, Neighborhood Development Services, Parks and <br />. She reviewed the history of the stormwater <br />program and the stormwater utility fee. She overviewed the proposed program fees and <br />mechanisms for implementation. <br /> <br />Ms. Jean Haggerty, project manager with AMEC Environment and Infrastructure, <br />presented to Council. She reviewed the decision making process for devising a fee <br />structure and discussing what the fees would pay for, the public process, and the work of <br />the advisory committee. The advisory committee decided to bond a lot of improvements <br />to keep capital costs low. to <br />provide regular oversight and examine how to take a more regional approach to <br />stormwater over the long term. <br /> <br />Ms. Riddervold reported on community engagement efforts. A 13-member <br />advisory committee representing a cross-section of interests in the community was <br />engaged to review and provide feedback on utility recommendations. A dedicated utility <br />proposal webpage was re-activated at www.charlottesville.org/stormwater. FAQs are <br />available as well as a link to a web-based GIS tool that provides parcel-specific <br />information about impervious surfaces, the number of associated billing units, and a <br />potential annual fee range. Two focus group meetings were held in late November, and <br />two drop-in informational open house sessions were also held in November at CitySpace. <br /> <br />Implementation of a utility fee requires adoption of a City ordinance. There will <br />be two readings of the ordinance and opportunity for comment at a public hearing on the <br />proposal. A public hearing is scheduled for January 22, 2013. <br /> <br />Mr. Huja said this is a very important policy decision, and he prefers there be a <br />Council work session before making a decision. Ms. Smith said she generally favors this <br />plan. She asked Ms. Haggerty if the new EPA ruling on stormwater would affect the <br />Chesapeake Bay TMDL. Ms. Haggerty said it would not. Ms. Smith asked if raising <br />bonds would affect our ceiling. Ms. Haggerty said this has been discussed with the <br />be no significant effect. <br /> <br />Ms. Szakos asked if this would mean taxes on gas would decrease. Ms. <br />Riddervold said it would simply mean that there would be no more gas dollars going <br />towards stormwater. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith asked if the properties that are exempted by law include the schools. <br />Ms. Riddervold said the fee will be waived for City of Charlottesville properties, <br />Albemarle County properties, and a few others. However, three of the nine school <br />properties are owned by the School Board and are therefore subject to the utility fee. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.