Laserfiche WebLink
A RESOLUTION <br />• OPPOSING THE ADOPTION OF A STATEWIDE <br />BUILDING MAINTENANCE CODE WHICH WOULD <br />SUPERCEDE THE CHARLOTTESVILLE HOUSING CODE. <br />WHEREAS, the Virginia Board of Housing and Community <br />Development is expected to vote August 19, 1985 on whether <br />to adopt a proposed statewide Building Maintenance Code; and <br />WHEREAS, adoption of such code would preclude Charlottes- <br />ville from enforcing its own housing code; and <br />WHEREAS, the proposed code, although based on the BOCA <br />Basic/National Existing Structures Code (1984 Edition), has <br />been substantially amended and significantly weakened; and <br />WHEREAS, the proposed code omits many important pro- <br />visions now covered in Charlottesville's housing code, and <br />would render our efforts to protect residents from unsafe <br />and unsanitary housing difficult, if not impossible; <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of <br />the City of Charlottesville, that the following urgent message <br />• be transmitted by the Clerk of Council to the Virginia Board <br />of Housing and Community Development as well as to the Governor <br />of Virginia; <br />The City Council of the City of Charlottes- <br />ville opposes the adoption of any statewide <br />Building Maintenance Code which would <br />preclude Charlottesville from enforcing <br />its housing code. We have no objection <br />to adoption of a model code which <br />localities could choose to enforce, but <br />Charlottesville and other localities should <br />not be precluded from continued enforce- <br />ment of local housing codes. All <br />communities have unique needs. <br />The proposed Code fails as an attempt to <br />strike a reasonable compromise between urban <br />and rural needs. The proposed Code omits <br />provisions relating to lead-based paint, <br />safety and cleanliness of yards, rat infest- <br />ation, space requirements per person, to <br />cite but a few examples. It also weakens <br />responsibility and penalty provisions, deletes <br />specifics and generalizes many requirements to <br />the point of rendering them unenforceable <br />platitudes. <br />