Laserfiche WebLink
• Access for pedestrians and bicycle travel to McIntire Park at the proposed intersection also <br />must be accommodated in an effective manner for the intersection to work as we desire and in <br />accord with the second Rieley Report (dated August 31, 2000, copy of which is enclosed). <br />(b) While the approval process, design and construction of the Parkway project goes <br />forward, Council is committed to seeking VDOT funding and approval for a second project - one <br />that results in a tight urban interchange which replaces the intersection described in section 4a. <br />Council's commitment is based in part on recommendations contained in an October 2000 report <br />of Rieley & Associates (copy of which is enclosed), and in part on a belief that such an <br />interchange will operate more efficiently, allow for safe pedestrian and bicycle access to the Park, <br />provide aesthetically pleasing access to the City, and help address long term traffic movement <br />needs between the 250 by-pass and the Parkway. To further underscore a desire on the City's part <br />to facilitate this second project, the City is willing to perform design, bid, and construction phases <br />of this second project - all within the required oversight parameters for this type of process. <br />5. Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel. Council endorses the construction of dedicated "on road" bicycle <br />lanes on each side of the Parkway's north -south travel lanes to serve high speed cyclists. In <br />addition and in accord with the Metropolitan Planning Organization (the MPO) recommendation, <br />Council also supports construction of a shared pedestrian/bicycle path much like the one proposed <br />by the VDOT design, but eight rather than five feet in width. <br />• 6. A New Lake or Pond for the Park. Combination of the storm water management facilities into <br />one pond or "lake", as in the Rieley report, is essential. The City will do everything within reason <br />to expand this concept in cooperation with VDOT. Everyone will benefit, park and outdoors <br />enthusiasts, and motorists using the Parkway. <br />7. Additional Park Land. The City's approval for the Meadowcreek Parkway design shall be and <br />is contingent upon the acquisition of replacement parkland and green space by the City , the <br />County, and VDOT to create a greater contiguous Park, for the use of our citizens throughout the <br />region and confirm the status of this new road as a true Parkway. This new park land and green <br />space is intended to replace the land lost to the Parkway as well as the loss of use imposed on <br />some of the remaining portions of McIntire Park. It is also intended to serve as a community asset <br />for Park/Rio and its environs, and to protect the view shed surrounding the Parkway and Park/Rio <br />Road. While an expert evaluation could be provided by a third party, such as the Va. Department <br />of Conservation and Recreation, we suggest that 50 acres of land, contiguous to the existing park <br />would be an appropriate replacement amount. <br />8 . Cell Towers. To supplement its revenues, VDOT has begun leasing portions of the public <br />rights-of-way that VDOT now "owns" - property originally acquired solely for traditional road <br />Page 3 of 8 <br />0 <br />