2000_Resolutions - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. as described in its report to RSWA dated August 18, 1997. If all of the • compounds listed on Exhibit 6 are less than detection levels in two consecutive monitoring events, RSWA may discontinue the monitoring. If the compounds listed on Exhibit 6 are detected, but at levels below the applicable risk screening levels developed by EPA Region III, RSWA may discontinue the monitoring; however, the Plaintiffs reserve the right to object to the discontinuation of the ambient air quality monitoring. If either RSWA or the Plaintiffs dispute whether the ambient air monitoring should continue, then such dispute may be brought to the Magistrate under the general dispute resolution procedures established in this Agreement. 7. End Use Plan. The Plaintiffs and the Defendants agree to engage in further good faith discussions with respect to the End Use Plan which is to be developed for the Ivy landfill property. The Plaintiffs understand that the Board of Supervisors alone has the ultimate authority to approve the End Use • Plan. I• C. Other Property Acquisition and Monetary Payments. 1. CERCLA Response Costs. The RSWA agrees to reimburse the CERCLA "response costs" submitted by the Plaintiffs, except for response costs related to the Batton Property that are recoverable under CERCLA, as consistent with the National Contingency Plan ('NCP"). These "response costs" are not to exceed $15,000. The reimbursement of the "response costs" requested by all Plaintiffs is subject to a review by the RSWA to determine their consistency with the NCP. Any dispute with respect to NCP consistency shall be resolved ultimately by United States Magistrate Judge B. Waugh Crigler of the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, or any other Magistrate Judge or District Judge of said United States District Court assigned should 26