My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988-09-12
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1988
>
1988-09-12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2002 8:09:21 PM
Creation date
8/14/2002 7:31:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
9/12/1988
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
197 <br /> <br />recommended, such as the expressway, appeared more <br />appropriate for larger, more urban cities and questioned <br />whether similar roadways existed in cities comparable to <br />Charlottesville and the consultants replied that they only <br />knew of similar roads in Huntsville, Alabama and Baton <br />Rouge, Louisiana. <br /> <br /> Ms. Sue Lewis, Planning Commission member, questioned <br />whether a combination of options was a possibility. <br /> <br /> Mr. Gene Wray of the Department of Transportation, <br />stated that only one option would be recommended, but the <br />Transportation Board could decide to approve a combination <br />of options. <br /> <br /> Ms. Waters stated that she felt it was important to <br />development an understand of possible impacts on the City <br />and begin communications with Albemarle County and the <br />University of Virginia in order to present a unified <br />position to the State. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brown stated that the premise on all the data being <br />collected is that Meadowcreek Parkway will be in place. <br /> <br /> Ms. Waters stated that it was her understanding that <br />the City had requested, and that it had been agreed, that <br />the impact would be studied both with and without the <br />Meadowcreek Parkway. <br /> <br /> Mr. Sours questioned whether the possible expansion of <br />the University of Virginia was taken into account in the <br />study, but Mr. Satyendra Huja, Director of Community <br />Development, replied that only normal growth was assumed in <br />the study. <br /> <br /> . Th/ meeting was adjourned <br /> <br />PrUdent ( - ~rk <br /> <br />COUNCIL CHAMBER - September 19, 1988 <br /> <br /> Council met in regular session on this date with the <br />following members present: Rev. Edwards, Mr. Towe, Mr. <br />Vandever, Ms. Waters. Absent: Mr. Buck. <br /> <br />MINUTES <br /> <br /> On motion by Mr. Vandever, seconded by Mr. Towe, the <br />minutes of the September 6th meeting were approved as <br />presented, with Mr. Buck and Rev. Edwards absent for the <br />vote. <br /> <br />PUBLIC <br /> <br />There were no matters by the public. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING: <br /> <br />STREET, N.E. <br /> <br />RELOCATION OF GIRLS' ATTENTION HOME TO 414 4TH <br /> <br /> Mr. Paul McWhinney, Administrator of the Community <br />Attention Home PrOgrams, summarized the report presented to <br />Council at the previous meeting regarding the proposed <br />relocation of the Girls' Attention Home to 414 4th Street, <br />N.E. <br /> <br />The public hearing was opened. <br /> <br /> Mr. Michael Carroll of 518 Park Plaza made the <br />following points'regarding the proposed relocation of the <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.