Laserfiche WebLink
On motion by Ms. Daugherty, seconded by Mr. Toscano, the ordinance entitled "AN <br />ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REORDAINING SECTION 17-32 OF THE <br />CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY CODE, 1990, AS AMENDED, RELATED TO STORAGE <br />OF INOPERATIVE MOTOR VEHICLES" was offered and carried over to the next meeting <br />for consideration. <br /> <br /> Responding to a question from Ms. Richards, Mr. Gouldman said that the City cannot <br />limit the amount of time that a covered inoperative vehicle can be kept. <br /> <br />PUBLIC <br /> <br />There were no matters by the public. <br /> <br />OTHER BUSINESS <br /> <br /> Mr. Cox said that he attended the Albemarle County Planning Commission meeting <br />where they were considering a text amendment regarding two sites proposed for commercial <br />development in the urban ring on 5th Street Extended. Mr. Cox said he finds the results of <br />the traffic study disturbing, but feels that the County is sensitive to the impact of the <br />proposed developments on the City. <br /> <br /> Ms. Slaughter asked staff about the status of the ordinance that had been proposed that <br />would prohibit people from living in automobiles, noting that this remains an issue in a City <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br /> Mr. Cox said that he was intrigued with the possible option of holding a referendum on <br />the Meadowcreek Parkway and asked for the City Attorney to comment on the possibility. <br /> <br /> Mr. Gouldman said that he is aware of two situations where the Council is allowed to <br />hold an advisory reference: charter amendments or ordinances, and is unsure whether a <br />referendum on the MeadoWcreek Parkway would fall into either of these categories. <br /> <br /> On motion by Ms. Richards, seconded by Ms. Daugherty, Council unanimously voted <br />to meet in executive session for the purpose of considering the acquisition or use of real <br />property for public purpose, or the disposition of publicly held property, as authorized by <br />Section 2.1-344(A)(3) of the Virginia Code, and more specifically described as property <br />south of Market Street and property in the Belmont area. <br /> <br /> Council reconvened in open session and, on motion by Ms. Daugherty, seconded by <br />Ms. Richards, certified that, to the best of each member's knowledge, (i) only public business <br />matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in <br />the executive meeting to which this certification resolution applies, and (ii) only such public <br />business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were <br />heard, discussed or considered by the Council. <br /> <br /> The meeting was adjourned. <br />President ~1 <br /> <br /> <br />