1998-09-08 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

271 Chief Rittenhouse said that the bulk of parking violations occur downtown, on West Main Street and at the University. Mr. Cox said he would be interested in researching practices in other cities, including imposition of a "superfine" for speeding in residential zones. Ms. Richards said she would like information from staff on what would be required to revise the fine structure for parking and moving violations, and 5/Ir. Gouldman said he will compare the City's fines with state statutes. Ms.. Richards asked why the location of radar are posted in advance, and Chief Rittenhouse said that it is used as a preventive measure to heighten awareness and reduce speeds throughout the City. Mr. Mike Fontaine, City Transportation Engineer, provided Council with a progress report on the City's traffic calming program. Mr. Fontaine said that most traffic calming addresses concerns regarding speeding, traffic and pedestrian safety and cut- through traffic on residential streets, not arterial roads. Mr. Fontaine said that the current process for instituting traffic calming is fundamentally neighborhood driven. Neighborhoods request traffic calming for certain areas, and staff review the proposal for feasibility and develop design solutions and costs, which are then presented to the neighborhood association. If the neighborhood association agrees, residents living near the proposed project are notified. If more than one third oppose the project, it will not be constructed. Mr. Fontaine noted that the process now used for neighborhood approval considers silence as approval, though this process is recommended to be changed to better determine neighborhood support.. Mr. Fontaine said that twelve traffic calming projects have been completed and base line data was collected as of April to determine how effective the measures are. Mr. Caravati asked how system wide impacts of traffic calming are being determined, and Mr. Fontaine said that counts are being collected on all roads and if the problem shifts to another road as a result of traffic calming, this can be addressed. Mr. Fontaine noted that staff will be able to do computer modeling to help address impacts. Mr. Cox said he hopes that staff will evaluate whether the change in the notification process is required since only one problem has arisen as a result of the current process, Mr. Cox said that he thinks it is a considerable burden to take a petition door to door, especially in lesser organized neighborhoods. Mr. Cox said he thinks it should be up to those who assume the idea is not good to prove that. Mr. Cox said that he does not think the City should retreat from its commitment to fast tracking traffic calming. Mr. Fontaine said staff want to assure that the neighborhood associations represent the will of the people, and noted that many communities use the petition process being recommended. Mr. Cox said he would be interested in surveying West Palm Beach, considered a vanguard of public participation, about their process for approval. Mr. Toscano asked if Park Street is considered an arterial road, and 5/lr: Fontaine said that the intended use of Park Street is not arterial, but is classified as an urban collector. Ms. Richards said that she is concerned about substituting a passive process for approval of neighborhood projects for an active one, adding that many times only a few people are advocating for a project and they need to sell their ideas to residents. APPROPRIATION: $250,000 - WEED AND SEED GRANT Mr, Leon Churchill, Assistant City Manager, gave an overview of the Weed and Seed Program and how it fits in with the City's neighborhood strategy. The Weed and Seed program is a community-based initiative that encourages innovation and a