Laserfiche WebLink
292 <br /> <br />ORDINANCE: TAX ABATEMENT FOR REHABILITATED Pd3SIDENTIAL <br />PROPERTY <br /> <br /> Mr. Satyendra Huja, Director of Strategic Planning, explained that one of the <br />goals of the City's Housing StrategY is to encourage middle income families to move into <br />and stay in the City by providing tax exemptions when they renovate their homes. The <br />proposed exemption applies to houses that are at last 25 years old, the improvements <br />must be valued at 20% of the assessed value of the house, and the exemption will apply <br />for 7 years. Conditions include: does not apply to detached Outdoor structures, must be a <br />residential structure, must be owner occupied at all times, must meet all building and <br />zoning requirements, and does not apply to demolition and reconstruction. Mr. Huja said <br />the Real Estate Assessor will administrate the prograrn~ The City's data system will need <br />to be modified at an unknown cost, but it is felt that will be minimal. Mr. Huja said that <br />in other communities that have such a program, no new staff were added. <br /> <br /> Mr. Cox, referring to Mr. Huja's statement that only 12 houses last year would <br />have met these requirements, said that seems very low, and questioned whether the <br />recpairement fnat the house be at leaSt 25 years will exclude many middle income <br />families. <br /> <br />Mr. Huja noted that 90% of the City's housing stock is over 25 years old. <br /> <br /> Mr. Caravati asked why demolitions are not allowed as he feels there are several <br />places where demolition would be a better economic choice, assuming they are not <br />historic. <br /> <br /> Mr. Huja said it was felt at this stage that the City should focus on rehabilitation <br />and they did not want to encourage demolitions: <br /> <br /> Mr. Caravati said he would like to encourage families in neighborhoods with <br />small houses to construct additions as he thinks that is where results will most likely <br />come. <br /> <br />Mr. Huja said that additions could be included. <br /> <br /> Responding to a question from Mr. Caravati, Mr. Huja said that while stafftalked <br />about putting a financial limit on the program, they felt we should wait and see if it <br />becomes a problem. <br /> <br /> Ms. Richards said the purpose is to encourage reinvestment and a person who <br />invests more will save more. She said she would not want to put a limit on the amount. <br /> <br /> Mr. Caravati asked if it would be possible to target specific areas of the City with <br />the program, and Mr. Gouldman replied that he thinks that could be done, but there <br />would need to be a rationale for doing so. <br /> <br /> Responding to a question from Mr. Caravati, Mr. Huja said that the ordinance <br />sunsets in 2005. <br /> <br /> Ms. Richards noted that other cities tend to be more aggressive with their <br />percentages and lengths of time for the abatement. <br /> <br />Mr. Huja said that staff felt that the program should start small. <br /> <br /> Ms. Richards asked if Council could extend the years of abatement for those <br />akeady receiving it after the ordinance is sunsetted and if it is reapproved, and Mr. <br />Gouldman said that may be possible, though there is some concern that the program <br />could be a huge success and very expensive. <br /> <br /> Ms. Richards said Cotmcil may want to extend the abatement to ten years as she <br />feels seven years is very timid. <br /> <br /> <br />