2000-11-06 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

227 Mr. Bob Stevens, 124 Goodman Street, said he thought Simplicity's was the most attractive proposal, though he likes the Belmont Commons proposal except for the density and traffic concerns. He asked where will excess parking be if not enough is provided on the site. Mr. Stevens said the City should create a new road into the property. Mr. Dave Norris, 704 Belmont Avenue, a member ofthe Simplicity Group, congratulated Belmont Commons, and said they have some good things in their proposal. He said he is concerned about the process, but is glad to hear that the developers are Committed to involving the neighborhood even though it did not happen earlier. Mr. Norris said that Simplicity took some flack for including lower price range houses and he thinks that is a shame as more needs to be done to accommodate this need. Ms. Michelle Matiole, 1404 E. Market Street, said we very much need truly affordable housing and any development should include t_Mt. Regarding the process, Ms. Matiole said that though cit/zen involvement occurred early in the process, a decision should not have been made by Council behind closed doors. Mr.. Jim Dettor, 1025 Carlton Avenue, said he has lived and owned property in Belmont for 56 years but many of the speakers opposing the property have only been here three to five years. Mr. Detter said Belmont has had a lot of decline and crime, but people are now fixing up properties and Belmont is coming back. Mr. Dettor said that traffic is a valid concern and suggested there may be a way to come in from Carlton Avenue ifjust during the construction with heavy equipment. Mr. Dettor said that Stonehaus has the resources to cam/through with the project and he feels it will be a nice project. Ms. Christine Palazzoto, P.ives Street, said she feels the Stonehaus plan is really nice and well thought out, She said she is disappointed that the Simplicity proposal is not part of the plan. She expressed concern with traffic and parking issues. Ms. Palazzolo asked that the one house he allowed to he built on Douglas Avenue and asked that the Simplicity proposal be reconsidered. A resident of 1215 Little High Street, a member of the Simplicity Group, said that the process has been disappointing and felt apart at the end.. She said she w~nted areal house with a porch. As there were no further speakers, the public hearing was closed. Mr. Toscano said he would like to find out more about traffic and parking. Mr. Toscano noted that the traffic projections have varied and asked if the streets can accommodate it. Mr. Huja said there has been some discussion about residents using the road next to the tracks to go to the bridge. He said the traffic projections are based on national standards and assume 364 trips per day. Mr. Huja said detached housing has higher trips per day than do condorniniums. Mr. Caravati asked what the current rating is of the street, but Mr. Huja said that local neighborhood streets are not ranked. Mr. Cox asked if there is a mechanism for evaluating traffic and said he is interested in staffs ability to study and look at other ak'ematives. Mr. Cox said he remains doubtful about the traffic projections and feels they are exaggerated though he thinks the concerns are legitimate. Mr. Huja said the only feasible alternative is for an outlet to go to the west. Ms. Richards said she is particularly interested in the comments made .about the proposal attracting people who will take stewardship. Ms. Richards said Council has an interest in improving the overall education at Clark School by diversifying the population in BeLmont. She said she would like to see alternative entrances developed.