Laserfiche WebLink
7 <br /> <br />the development, a tree replacement plan, and a landscaped buffer on the northern edge of the <br />property. The property is further identified as Tax Map 60 Parcels 81.8, 91, 120, 120A-C, 121, 122.4-7 having road frontage on Stonehenge Avenue and Quarry Road containing approximately <br />240,887 square feet of land or 5.53 acres. The PUD zoning allows an applicant to present a <br />proposal independent of established zoning categories for consideration by the governing body. This proposal consists of approximately 26 single family detached dwellings with open <br />space and a density of no greater than 4.7 DUA. The general uses called for in the Land Use Plan of the Comprehensive Plan are for Single-Family Residential. Report prepared by Brian Haluska, Neighborhood Planner. Presented by Willy Thompson <br /> Mr. Thompson provided the staff report. <br />Ms. Keller stated that the PUD and Critical slopes applications will be considered at the same time. <br />Ms. Creasy stated that City Council suggested that this be brought back to the Planning Commission for <br />further discussion based on the changes presented. <br />Ms. Keller called for questions from the Commissioners; with no one having questions she opened the <br />public hearing. <br />Public Hearing <br /> Mr. Steve Miller, 918 Druid Ave, feels that the new drawings are better. He would like to see some <br />language added about the path that could dump water onto his property. <br /> Ms. Marla Zeigler, she feels the applicant has done a much better job. <br /> Michael Henniker, 1006 Druid Ave, is in favor of the new plan but feels he can’t really comment on the engineering side. <br /> Martha Dix, 914 Druid Ave, would like to know if the stream will remain in the culvert. <br /> <br />Ms. Keller closed the public hearing. <br />Discussion <br /> Mr. Keesecker stated that he met with the developers as a committee appointee. He felt the meeting went <br />well and noted the improved streetscape that wouldn’t be dominated by cars. He feels there may be some <br />details that may need to be worked out though when looking at the technical aspects. <br />Mr. Osteen feels the applicant has responded to some of the larger concerns and he could support the <br />project now. <br />Mr. Santoski is very surprise to see what a great job the applicant has done. He feels this is the best we will see done to this project. He is really not concerned with the Druid connection. <br />Mr. Rosensweig is still struggling. He doesn’t see any consistency with the housing portion of the comp plan. <br />Ms. Keller is in agreement with Mr. Rosensweig. She appreciates the applicant taking time to redo the plan but does not feel it is harmonious with other houses in Belmont. <br /> <br />The Commission discussed some of the details of the project prior to the applicant’s report.