My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PC_A_06-11-2013
Charlottesville
>
Neighborhood Development
>
Planning Commission
>
Agendas
>
2013
>
PC_A_06-11-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 4:53:32 PM
Creation date
5/7/2020 4:53:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> <br />Mr. Osteen is comfortable and complimented staff on a job well done. <br /> Mr. Keesecker is very pleased and appreciates the changes. He has really learned a lot from the <br />community during this process. <br /> Mr. Santoski is concerned that the public doesn’t realize how much work goes into this process. He feels <br />they would appreciate it more if they knew. He likes the changes and the links that were added. Ms. Keller stated that comments will be incorporated and updated on the web page. <br /> Mr. Santoski asked if the navigation process through the document would be easy. <br />Ms. Creasy stated that links will be provided and the plan will be accessible. <br />There was a brief discussion about one section of the housing chapter and the wording was resolved. <br /> The Commission is okay with adding the comments Woolen Mills presented. <br /> <br />Mr. Santoski feels that affordable housing is not always low income housing and that needs to be considered. <br /> <br />Ms. Keller was concerned about school statistics for the next five years. <br />Ms. Creasy stated that the plan does not get into those issues, but some links and statistics are provided. She stated that we do coordinate with the schools. <br />Ms. Galvin asked if the comp plan is the guide used for review of a PUD application. Ms. Creasy stated that there is a section in the plan that discusses PUDs and it is one factor for <br />consideration. <br />Mr. Santoski feels that the Cherry and Ridge project could have a lot of low income households and the <br />impact that has on the schools should be considered. <br />Ms. Keller stated that data would come from the schools, not the comp plan. You will be able to find <br />some guidance in the plan, but we don’t have the background to make judgments on school decisions. <br />Mr. Rosensweig would like to continue to see references to housing and the impacts on schools. Mr. Norris wanted to know how integrated housing could be? He feels we need the ability to <br />communicate with the community. Mr. Emory provided clarification on changes the Woolen Mills neighborhood would like and the changes <br />to the introductory sentence. <br />Ms. Sienitsky noted that changing the first sentence would be fine. She doesn’t like changing the word <br />unique to historic. <br />Mr. Emory suggested the sentence reading as follows; Unique historic residential community. <br /> Ms. Keller would like to see 6.7 added to the urban design section dedicating parts of the woolen mills <br />conservation neighborhood. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.