My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1965 ORDINANCES
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Ords Res App
>
BOOK 4_SEP 16 1963-DEC 19 1977
>
1965 ORDINANCES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2024 3:39:27 PM
Creation date
9/19/2021 1:17:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TRACT HELD IN SINGLE OWNERSHIP AS OF FEBRUARY 17, 1958. <br />tt(B) INTERPRET THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE WHERE THE STREET LAYOUT ACTUALLY ON THE GROUND, <br />VARIES FROM THE STREET LAYOUT AS SHOWN ON THE DISTRICT MAP MADE A PART OF THIS ORDINANCE. • <br />tt(C) PERMIT THE ERECTION AND USE OF A BUILDING OR THE USE OF PREMISES IN ANY LOCATION FOR A <br />PUBLIC SERVICE CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES WHICH THE BOARD DEEMS REASONABLY NECESSARY <br />FOR THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND WELFARE. <br />tt(D) PERMIT THE OCCUPANCY OF A SINGLE DETACHED RESIDENCE IN AN R-1 OR R-2 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT <br />BY MORE THAN TWO HOUSEKEEPING UNITS, PROVIDED: <br />tt(1) THAT SUCH RESIDENCE SHALL HAVE BEEN IN EXISTENCE ON JANUARY 21, 1932. <br />tt(2) THAT SUCH MULTIPLE OCCUPANCY SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO ALTER THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD <br />IN WHICH SUCH RESIDENCE IS LOCATED. <br />tt(3) THAT THE OUTSIDE SHAPE OF THE RESIDENCE SHALL NOT BE ALTERED IN ANY MATERIAL PARTICULAR. <br />tt(E) PERMIT THE COMPLETION AND USE OF ANY DWELLING THAT WAS DESIGNED AND SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED <br />PRIOR TO JULY 23, 1964, FOR TWO-FAMILY USE; PROVIDED, THAT THE OWNER CAN PROVE TO THE BOARDS SATISFACTION <br />THAT THE HOUSE WAS DESIGNED AND INTENDED FOR TWO-FAMILY USE WHEN ORIGINALLY CONSTRUCTED. ANY DWELLING • <br />FOR WHICH AN EXCEPTION UNDER THIS PARAGRAPH (E) IS GRANTED SHALL BE CONSIDERED A CONFORMING USE. <br />"NO SPECIAL EXCEPTION MAY BE GRANTED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION EXCEPT AFTER NOTICE AND HEARING AS <br />PROVIDED BY SECTION 15.1-431 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA. <br />it ANY PRIVILEGE OR VARIANCE GRANTED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS UNDER SUB -SECTION 3 OF THIS SECTION <br />SHALL BE CONSIDERED CANCELLED IF THE APPLICANT DOES NOT AVAIL HIMSELF OF SUCH PRIVILEGE WITHIN NINETY <br />DAYS FROM THE DATE OF ISSUANCE OF SUCH PRIVILEGE; PROVIDED, THAT THE BOARD, FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, MAY, <br />UPON PROPER APPLICATION AND AFTER DUE NOTICE, EXTEND SUCH PRIVILEGE OR VARIANCE FOR A PERIOD NOT TO <br />EXCEED NINETY ADDITIONAL DAYS. <br />"IN EXERCISING THE POWERS GRANTED TO IT, THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MAY REVERSE OR AFFIRM, WHOLLY <br />OR PARTLY, OR MAY MODIFY THE ORDER, REQUIREMENT, DECISION OR DETERMINATION APPEALED FROM. THE CONCURRING <br />VOTE OF THREE MEMBERS SHALL BE NECESSARY TO REVERSE ANY ORDER, REQUIREMENT, DECISION OR DETERMINATION <br />OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR TO DECIDE IN FAVOR OF THE APPLICANT ON ANY MATTER UPON WHICH IT IS REQUIRED <br />TO PASS UNDER THIS ORDINANCE, OR TO EFFECT ANY VARIANCE FROM THIS ORDINANCEtt. <br />SECTION 7. SECTION 68, PARAGRAPH 5, IS HEREBY AMENDED AND REENACTED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: <br />tt5. COSTS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED AGAINST THE BOARD, UNLESS IT SHALL APPEAR TO THE COURT THAT THE <br />BOARD ACTED IN BAD FAITH OR WITH MALICE IN MAKING THE DECISION APPEALED FROM". <br />SECTION 8. SECTION 76 IS HEREBY AMENDED AND REENACTED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: <br />ttl. ALL PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR <br />RECOMMENDATION AND REPORT PRIOR TO ACTION THEREON BY THE CITY COUNCIL. THE PLANNING COMMISSION SHALL <br />HOLD AT LEAST ONE PUBLIC HEARING ON SUCH PROPOSED AMENDMENTS AND MAY MAKE APPROPRIATE CHANGES IN THE • <br />PROPOSED AMENDMENTS AS A RESULT OF SUCH HEARING. UPON THE COMPLETION OF ITS WORK, THE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />SHALL PRESENT THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL, TOGETHER WITH ITS RECOMMENDATIONS AND ANY <br />APPROPRIATE EXPLANATORY MATERIALS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THE FAILURE OF THE <br />PLANNING COMMISSION TO REPORT WITHIN NINETY DAYS AFTER THE FIRST MEETING OF THE COMMISSION AFTER THE <br />PROPOSED AMENDMENT HAS BEEN REFERRED TO THE COMMISSION SHALL BE DEEMED APPROVAL. <br />tt2. BEFORE APPROVING AND ADOPTING ANY AMENDMENT TO THIS ORDINANCE, THE CITY COUNCIL SHALL HOLD AT <br />LEAST ONE PUBLIC HEARING THEREON, AFTER WHICH THE CITY COUNCIL MAY MAKE APPROPRIATE CHANGES OR CORRECTIONS <br />IN THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT; PROVIDED, THAT NO ADDITIONAL LAND MAY BE ZONED TO A DIFFERENT CLASSIFICATION <br />THAN WAS CONTAINED IN THE PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY THIS SECTION WITHOUT AN ADDITIONAL PUBLIC HEARING <br />AFTER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY THIS SECTION. AN AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF AT LEAST A MAJORITY OF THE MEMBERS OF <br />THE CITY COUNCIL SHALL BE REQUIRED TO AMEND ANY PROVISION OF THIS ORDINANCE. <br />tt3. THE PLANNING COMMISSION SHALL NOT RECOMMEND, NOR SHALL THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT, ANY AMENDMENT • <br />TO THIS ORDINANCE UNTIL NOTICE OF INTENTION TO DO SO HAS BEEN PUBLISHED ONCE A WEEK FOR TWO SUCCESSIVE <br />WEEKS IN A NEWSPAPER PUBLISHED OR HAVING GENERAL CIRCULATION IN THE CITY. SUCH NOTICE SHALL SPECIFY <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.