1973 ORDINANCES - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r- 4, `- � a 2 S G F. PARKING LOTS WHICH ARE OTHERWISE PERMISSIBLE UNDER EXISTING CITY ORDINANCES ARE PERMITTED WITHIN THE FP DISTRICT IF MARKED BY A SIGN INDICATING THE AREA THAT IS SUBJECT TO FLOODING AND WARNING PARKERS OF THE POTENTIAL DANGER. G. CAMPGROUNDS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION THROUGH THE PROCEDURES OF SITE PALN REVIEW PROVIDED IN §72A. H. MARINAS, BOAT RENTAL FACILITIES AND OTHER SIMILAR USES SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION THROUGH THE PROCEDURES OF SITE PLAN REVIEW PROVIDE IN §72A. I. SAND AND GRAVEL EXTRACTION OPERATIONS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION THROUGH THE PROCEDURES OF SITE PLAN REVIEW PROVIDED IN §72A. J. THE STRAIGHTENING OF ANY STREAM, OR THE ALTERING OF ITS COURSE IN ANY WAY, SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION THROUGH THE PROCEDURES OF SITE PLAN REVIEW PROVIDED IN §72A. SECTION 43E. DISCONTINUANCE OF USES. IF THE USE OF ANY STRUCTURE WHICH EXISTED PRIOR TO THE DATE OF ENACTMENT OF THIS,\ARTICLE IS DISCONTINUED FOR TWO CONSECUTIVE YEARS, ANY FUTURE USE OF THE STRUCTURE SHALL BE CONSIDERED A NEW USE AND SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN THIS ARTICLE. SECTION 43F. DOCUMENTS TO BE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION. COPIES OF ALL U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS' STUDIES AND OTHER AVAILABLE DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO THE FLOOD PLAINS OF THE RIVANNA RIVER, MOORES CREEK AND MEADOW CREEK WHICH ARE RELEVANT TO THE DETERMINATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN THIS ARTICLE SHALL BE KEPT ON FILE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT. SECTION 43G. WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY. THE GRANTING OF APPROVAL OF ANY STRUCTURE OR USE SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE A REPRESENTATION, GUARANTEE, OR WARRANTY OF ANY KIND OR NATURE BY THE CITY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OR BY ANY OFFICER OR SAFETY OF ANY STRUCTURE OR USE PROPOSED AND SHALL CREATE NO LIABILITY UPON OR CAUSE ACTION AGAINST SUCH PUBLIC BODY, OFFICER, OR EMPLOYEE FOR ANY DAMAGE THAT MAY RESULT PURSUANT THERETO. THE DEGREE OF FLOOD PROTECTION REQUIRED BY THIS ARTICLE WITHIN THE FP DISTRICT IS CONSIDERED REASONABLE FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND IS BASED ON ENGINEERING AND SCIENTIFIC METHODS OF STUDY. THE DISTRICT AND ARTICLE DO NOT IMPLY THAT AREAS OUTSIDE THE FLOOD PLAN DISTRICT OR LAND USES PERMITTED WITHIN SUCH DISTRICTS WILL BE FREE FROM FLOODING OR FLOOD DAMAGE. NOTHING CONTAINED HEREIN SHALL CREATE ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF THE CITY OR ANY OFFICER, AGENCY OR EMPLOYEE THEREOF FOR ANY FLOOD DAMAGE THAT RESULTS FROM RELIANCE ON THIS ARTICLE OR ANY ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION LAWFULLY MADE HEREUNDER. SECTION 43H. APPEALS. AN APPLICANT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL AS REQUIRED IN THIS CHAPTER MAY APPEAL THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION ON THE SITE PLAN TO THE CITY COUNCIL. L CLERK ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL JUNE 4, 1973 AYES: MR. BARBOUR, MR. FIFE, MR. GILLIAM, MRS. RINEHART, AND MR. VAN YAHRES. NOES: NONE PRESIDENT AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT THE DISTRICT MAP INCORPORATED IN SECTION 4 OF ARTICLE III OF APPENDIX II OF THE CODE 0 FTHE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, 1965, BY THE REZONING OF A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND AT THE INTERSECTION OF MIDLAND STREET AND NASSAU STREET. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, THAT THE DISTRICT MAP INCORPORATED IN SECTION 4 OF ARTICLE III OF APPENDIX II OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, 1965, BE AMENDED AND REENACTED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 4. DISTRICT MAP THERE IS HEREBY CHANGED FROM R-2 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO B-2 BUSINESS DISTRICT THAT AREA DESIGNATED AS PARCEL 85, LOTS 15 THRU 22, ON CITY REAL PROPERTY TAX MAP 56, LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF MIDLAND STREET AND NASSAU STREET. CLERK ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL JUNE 25, 1973 AYES: MR. FIFE, MR. GILLIAM, MRS. RINEHART AND MR. VAN YAHRES. NOES: NONE ABSENT: MR. BARBOUR PRESIDENT • • •